I own an EMF meter and have personally measured exposures in my daily life from normal usage situations that exceed the exposure level that is documented in studies. Again I don’t have the citations but I did 10 years ago and personally read the papers that documented these figures. These are in μW/m2.
Minimum needed for cell phone: 0.000002
Pine needles age prematurely: 0.27
Children experience headache, irritation, concentration difficulties, behavioral problems: 500
A German regulatory agency marks extreme concern at this level: 1000
Without context, those numbers mean nothing and they are such small emissions that they are meaningless.
Minimum needed from cell phones is 0.000002 nanowatts? Minimum needed for what? Im pretty sure that's single electron levels of energy, there.
Then, id have to ask: what kind of heart exposure was measured? Direct tissue (petridish) or insitu? If insitu, what was the methodology? Were these models? Surveys? Data dredges?
The surveys I gave you showed directed emissions millions of times more powerful than your numbers and showed little effect at extreme and near constant exposure.
Look, I recognize that you are not keen to agree with anything I or Shanahan are saying and that I must produce fully cited evidence to progress in this conversation, and I don’t have the time to do so, and it’s possible that the cell phone thing was a transcription error I made 11 years ago. So I will close the conversation. Maybe as MAHA proceeds you’ll come across the scientific support for this perspective elsewhere. Good day.
I hope you take the time to read the information I provided when you find the time. Just accepting every claim without discernment will destroy MAGA. Be well.
I own an EMF meter and have personally measured exposures in my daily life from normal usage situations that exceed the exposure level that is documented in studies. Again I don’t have the citations but I did 10 years ago and personally read the papers that documented these figures. These are in μW/m2.
Minimum needed for cell phone: 0.000002
Pine needles age prematurely: 0.27
Children experience headache, irritation, concentration difficulties, behavioral problems: 500
A German regulatory agency marks extreme concern at this level: 1000
Decreased sperm viability. Headache, dizziness, irritability, fatigue, weakness, insomnia, chest pain, difficulty breathing, indigestion: 10,000
Altered calcium metabolism in the heart: 25,000
Changes in hippocampus affecting memory and learning: 40,000
DNA damage in cells: 60,000
Single “smart meter”: 79,300
Avoidance reflex following 30-minute exposure: 100,000
Lowest safety standard in US/Canada: 6,000,000
Without context, those numbers mean nothing and they are such small emissions that they are meaningless.
Minimum needed from cell phones is 0.000002 nanowatts? Minimum needed for what? Im pretty sure that's single electron levels of energy, there.
Then, id have to ask: what kind of heart exposure was measured? Direct tissue (petridish) or insitu? If insitu, what was the methodology? Were these models? Surveys? Data dredges?
The surveys I gave you showed directed emissions millions of times more powerful than your numbers and showed little effect at extreme and near constant exposure.
Look, I recognize that you are not keen to agree with anything I or Shanahan are saying and that I must produce fully cited evidence to progress in this conversation, and I don’t have the time to do so, and it’s possible that the cell phone thing was a transcription error I made 11 years ago. So I will close the conversation. Maybe as MAHA proceeds you’ll come across the scientific support for this perspective elsewhere. Good day.
I hope you take the time to read the information I provided when you find the time. Just accepting every claim without discernment will destroy MAGA. Be well.
The studies I’ve already read are responsive to the claims you made.