Besides, MSN, this also is a manner of false reporting:
A theory is scientifically falsified by evidence, Yes ... I know, you have a highly contentious relationship with evidence. Note, I did not say fact, but evidence.
And, within the current scientific community at large, especially the drug-science, the question that is being sought to be answered is often not the right question, or even a helpful question.
A case in point? Well, Take the study where Remsidivir was tested against the efficacy of a high dose of HCQ to combat laate stage covid patients.
What was tested against was not the regime Prof Dr. Raoul came up with, but just an ioniphore. Conclusion: HCQ did nothing for late state patients, whereas Remsidivir was praised into high heaven.
Of course this is wrong, as it is the wrong question. If they had tested Remsidivir against the real protocol ..... Remsidivir would not been provided the basis for prescription in emergency, as people die from Remsidivir with "covid" andnot from covid.
Why? A theory is the highest from of explanation and is not written in stone. Many theories people thought were correct, have been fallen to the way side,when, through rigorous testing and investigation, a different theory was accepted. So, you need the right question with strong evidence.
Anything less than that, is a hypothesis or even worse in scientific knowledge: a hunch.
However, you, MSN, played your own role in this whole COVID debacle, and YOU are debunked as Fake NEWS, and we have the goodies to show you.
Show me the goodies then.
Besides, MSN, this also is a manner of false reporting:
A theory is scientifically falsified by evidence, Yes ... I know, you have a highly contentious relationship with evidence. Note, I did not say fact, but evidence.
And, within the current scientific community at large, especially the drug-science, the question that is being sought to be answered is often not the right question, or even a helpful question.
A case in point? Well, Take the study where Remsidivir was tested against the efficacy of a high dose of HCQ to combat laate stage covid patients.
What was tested against was not the regime Prof Dr. Raoul came up with, but just an ioniphore. Conclusion: HCQ did nothing for late state patients, whereas Remsidivir was praised into high heaven.
Of course this is wrong, as it is the wrong question. If they had tested Remsidivir against the real protocol ..... Remsidivir would not been provided the basis for prescription in emergency, as people die from Remsidivir with "covid" andnot from covid.
Why? A theory is the highest from of explanation and is not written in stone. Many theories people thought were correct, have been fallen to the way side,when, through rigorous testing and investigation, a different theory was accepted. So, you need the right question with strong evidence.
Anything less than that, is a hypothesis or even worse in scientific knowledge: a hunch.
However, you, MSN, played your own role in this whole COVID debacle, and YOU are debunked as Fake NEWS, and we have the goodies to show you.
And that' s a fact!