I will post a separate response regarding French Revolution, but in this comment I just want to address the idea of Christian Nationalism being part of the Hegelian Dialectic (and Hegelian Dialectic in general).
History of catholic church is indeed the history of various secret occults trying to take control of the Church and its enormous body of influence on the people.
The fact that Church has been involved in the power play with the secret occults, however, does not necessarily mean its part of a Hegelian dialectic. It just means they are part of the power struggle over people. The distinction is subtle but important.
Hegelian dialectic is the unique mode of a "problem created" and a "fake solution offered" where the fake solution is actually the desired end result.
Like 911 and Patriot Act. Patriot Act was the end result and it gave full surveillance control over people.
What exactly would be the end result of the Church as part of a Hegelian Dialectic ?
Just like Patriot Act, it will be about total control of our life. They have shown their desired outcome, most famously in the show/book "Hand Maiden's Tale". A completely authoritative State controlled by the Church which dictates every aspect of people's lives, in the name of religion.
The closest they ever got to making this a reality was the whole LDS conspiracy, that Bill Cooper exposed (and Mitt Romney amongst other people were key people in this).
But this is simple the authoritarian Christianity we are talking about. "Christian Nationalism" by itself is such a fuzzy term, specifically used to smear any kinds of nationalism based on morality.
If you are talking about the weaponisation of Church - thats a totally valid concern. "Christian Nationalism" as part of the Hegelian Dialectic, esp in French Revolution - sorry, it makes absolutely no sense.
By Christian Nationalism I'm talking the legal codification of Church dogma, such as 'Sunday Laws'. Sharia Law would be another example. When this happens, abuse is sure to follow, and what happens when the "authorized church" adopts beliefs which differ from your own? You get labeled a heretic and suffer the consequences!
By Hegelian Dialectic in this case I'm talking about the purposeful spreading of Communism, Athiesm, moral decay of all sorts, lawlessness (such as the illegal immigration issue) etc. What this then does, and I've seen it first-hand all over Gab, Twitter, 4chan and kun, is cause foolish people to request for a theocratic-dictatorship in order to restore moral order. Nick Fuentes is the best example I can put with a face and a name. He literally wants us to be under a king, who is subject to the pope of Rome. This was in fact the way the world operated for centuries before the Reformation begun its downfall.
I recently came upon some claims that the Jesuits instigated the French Revolution in order to swing the 'enlightenment' back towards Rome, which was losing more and more power during that time, thanks in large part to some ~300 years of the men of the Reformation spreading the truth and exposing Rome. Remember, the Jesuits were created precisely to destroy the Reformation, and are the military and intel agency arm of the Vatican. Their tactics are the forerunner tactics of what we see today; false flags, spies and double / triple agents, assassinations made to look like accidents, political intrigue of all sorts, having agents in plain sight like doctors or lawyers with secret, higher loyalties to Rome than to their country and profession, etc. Let's say an enemy of Rome goes in for surgery, and the doc is a Jesuit. All they'd have to do is get word to him from the top levels of the Society of Jesus and bam, the doc "made a mistake" and nicked a main artery and the enemy of Rome died! Stuff like that I imagine.
Anyways, the claim about the revolution might be total speculation, I don't know. But the meme still hits for us today. One could replace "Christian Nationalism" with a more blanket "Totalitarianism" I suppose. I used the Good Cop Bad Cop theme because both of them are working for the same force. One is obviously ridiculous and insufferable from the outset, while the other sounds really good and reasonable. Both lead to the same result though, which is your ass in jail!
I can think of one more situation off-hand where this was used, and that would be the Wiemar Republic. The Nazis gained support in a major way thanks to an over-correction bounced off of that cesspool.
You are absolutely right, that Christianity can be weaponised by pushing for "fundamentalism". But it is also absolutely important to remember that real Christianity, as in what Jesus taught us, is essential for defeating the Satanists.
There is a reason why Q Plan is "Biblical" and it does not refer just to the scale of this operation, but the continuity of the same battle between good and evil.
It is not a coincidence that the reason Jesus got crucifixed was because he exposed the Banksters of his time in the temple.
Without drawing this fine line between the benign teachings of Jesus and the weaponised, extreme versions in either direction is how we lose.
The enemy does not want us to succeed in finding this fine balance, and hence its up to us to make sure we never lose sight of this.
I argue that true Christianity, if such a label can even be ascribed, would NEVER be able to be weaponized by satan. This is precisely why I believe the Catholic church is NOT Christian at all, but rather a parallel, pseudo-christian, CINO (christian in name only) front for satan. Mystery Babylon's culmination. All the pagan religions merged into one, from the Tower of Babel up into the present day.
The true Christians splintered off from the Catholic church long ago, in various eras, and were largely tortured and killed for doing so. The institutions which have arisen in their names are mere daughters of the harlot Catholic church. No such institutions were sanctioned by any of the Apostles. The true church of Christ Jesus our Lord is the invisible, total group of all who believe in Him on the earth. There is no institution which encompasses them.
This is precisely why I believe the Catholic church is NOT Christian at all, but rather a parallel, pseudo-christian, CINO (christian in name only) front for satan
At the risk of upsetting a lot of people here, I tend to agree with this, but also want to point out that most Catholic people are good at heart, its the church thats subverted. But many end up being subverted themselves because they end up blindly following their preachers rather than try to find a personal connection with Jesus.
Some people say that the Orthodox church is the closest to the true Christian church, and was not a offshoot of Catholic but rather direct offshoot from the apostles, in parallel to the Catholic church.
Personally, though, if you are a curious mind with critical thinking, you dont need a church or anyone to preach you Christianity. The gospels are very self evidence, and Jesus taught nothing but compassion, kindness, humility and love for all. He also taught us that the judgement of sins are between a person and the God, and not anyone else's business.
If you accept these tenets as fundamental to your way of your life, its almost impossible to be weaponised. The key is to follow the morality yourself, but not judge others.
I will post a separate response regarding French Revolution, but in this comment I just want to address the idea of Christian Nationalism being part of the Hegelian Dialectic (and Hegelian Dialectic in general).
History of catholic church is indeed the history of various secret occults trying to take control of the Church and its enormous body of influence on the people.
The fact that Church has been involved in the power play with the secret occults, however, does not necessarily mean its part of a Hegelian dialectic. It just means they are part of the power struggle over people. The distinction is subtle but important.
Hegelian dialectic is the unique mode of a "problem created" and a "fake solution offered" where the fake solution is actually the desired end result.
Like 911 and Patriot Act. Patriot Act was the end result and it gave full surveillance control over people.
What exactly would be the end result of the Church as part of a Hegelian Dialectic ?
Just like Patriot Act, it will be about total control of our life. They have shown their desired outcome, most famously in the show/book "Hand Maiden's Tale". A completely authoritative State controlled by the Church which dictates every aspect of people's lives, in the name of religion.
The closest they ever got to making this a reality was the whole LDS conspiracy, that Bill Cooper exposed (and Mitt Romney amongst other people were key people in this).
But this is simple the authoritarian Christianity we are talking about. "Christian Nationalism" by itself is such a fuzzy term, specifically used to smear any kinds of nationalism based on morality.
If you are talking about the weaponisation of Church - thats a totally valid concern. "Christian Nationalism" as part of the Hegelian Dialectic, esp in French Revolution - sorry, it makes absolutely no sense.
By Christian Nationalism I'm talking the legal codification of Church dogma, such as 'Sunday Laws'. Sharia Law would be another example. When this happens, abuse is sure to follow, and what happens when the "authorized church" adopts beliefs which differ from your own? You get labeled a heretic and suffer the consequences!
By Hegelian Dialectic in this case I'm talking about the purposeful spreading of Communism, Athiesm, moral decay of all sorts, lawlessness (such as the illegal immigration issue) etc. What this then does, and I've seen it first-hand all over Gab, Twitter, 4chan and kun, is cause foolish people to request for a theocratic-dictatorship in order to restore moral order. Nick Fuentes is the best example I can put with a face and a name. He literally wants us to be under a king, who is subject to the pope of Rome. This was in fact the way the world operated for centuries before the Reformation begun its downfall.
I recently came upon some claims that the Jesuits instigated the French Revolution in order to swing the 'enlightenment' back towards Rome, which was losing more and more power during that time, thanks in large part to some ~300 years of the men of the Reformation spreading the truth and exposing Rome. Remember, the Jesuits were created precisely to destroy the Reformation, and are the military and intel agency arm of the Vatican. Their tactics are the forerunner tactics of what we see today; false flags, spies and double / triple agents, assassinations made to look like accidents, political intrigue of all sorts, having agents in plain sight like doctors or lawyers with secret, higher loyalties to Rome than to their country and profession, etc. Let's say an enemy of Rome goes in for surgery, and the doc is a Jesuit. All they'd have to do is get word to him from the top levels of the Society of Jesus and bam, the doc "made a mistake" and nicked a main artery and the enemy of Rome died! Stuff like that I imagine.
Anyways, the claim about the revolution might be total speculation, I don't know. But the meme still hits for us today. One could replace "Christian Nationalism" with a more blanket "Totalitarianism" I suppose. I used the Good Cop Bad Cop theme because both of them are working for the same force. One is obviously ridiculous and insufferable from the outset, while the other sounds really good and reasonable. Both lead to the same result though, which is your ass in jail!
I can think of one more situation off-hand where this was used, and that would be the Wiemar Republic. The Nazis gained support in a major way thanks to an over-correction bounced off of that cesspool.
You are absolutely right, that Christianity can be weaponised by pushing for "fundamentalism". But it is also absolutely important to remember that real Christianity, as in what Jesus taught us, is essential for defeating the Satanists.
There is a reason why Q Plan is "Biblical" and it does not refer just to the scale of this operation, but the continuity of the same battle between good and evil.
It is not a coincidence that the reason Jesus got crucifixed was because he exposed the Banksters of his time in the temple.
Without drawing this fine line between the benign teachings of Jesus and the weaponised, extreme versions in either direction is how we lose.
The enemy does not want us to succeed in finding this fine balance, and hence its up to us to make sure we never lose sight of this.
I argue that true Christianity, if such a label can even be ascribed, would NEVER be able to be weaponized by satan. This is precisely why I believe the Catholic church is NOT Christian at all, but rather a parallel, pseudo-christian, CINO (christian in name only) front for satan. Mystery Babylon's culmination. All the pagan religions merged into one, from the Tower of Babel up into the present day.
The true Christians splintered off from the Catholic church long ago, in various eras, and were largely tortured and killed for doing so. The institutions which have arisen in their names are mere daughters of the harlot Catholic church. No such institutions were sanctioned by any of the Apostles. The true church of Christ Jesus our Lord is the invisible, total group of all who believe in Him on the earth. There is no institution which encompasses them.
At the risk of upsetting a lot of people here, I tend to agree with this, but also want to point out that most Catholic people are good at heart, its the church thats subverted. But many end up being subverted themselves because they end up blindly following their preachers rather than try to find a personal connection with Jesus.
Some people say that the Orthodox church is the closest to the true Christian church, and was not a offshoot of Catholic but rather direct offshoot from the apostles, in parallel to the Catholic church.
Personally, though, if you are a curious mind with critical thinking, you dont need a church or anyone to preach you Christianity. The gospels are very self evidence, and Jesus taught nothing but compassion, kindness, humility and love for all. He also taught us that the judgement of sins are between a person and the God, and not anyone else's business.
If you accept these tenets as fundamental to your way of your life, its almost impossible to be weaponised. The key is to follow the morality yourself, but not judge others.