New Study Finds Crazy Jew Did Not Invent Communism! 🤣
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (30)
sorted by:
But...they brought it to Russia AND China.
Yeah. I need to do a deep dive into Bolshevism at some point. I bet I find some dasting connections! Problem-Reaction-Solution connections, that is.!
The 'Jewish question' is nearing its final form. It will soon fall apart. In order to combat the Reformers, the papacy created the Jesuits as their propaganda and special ops unit and the Jesuits created counter-narratives as a response – promoting them throughout Europe with their vast resources. It was, and still is, the ultimate disinformation campaign and the Jews have played an integral part in this charade for the pope for at least the last 120 years. Nevertheless, a Jesuit named Luis de Alcasar created Preterism, where everything is pushed to the past and end times bible prophecy deals just with the Jews of ancient times, while Manuel Lacunza, Francisco Ribera and Cardinal Robert Bellarmine popularized Futurism – the narrative that end times bible prophecy deals with just the future and, yet again, the Jews as the center of prophecy with a rebuilt Jewish temple. Is it any wonder we have so many Christians utterly confused, throwing their blind support behind a terror-state!
True to her moniker, Mystery Babylon is the Mother of Abominations of the Earth. She is the one who created Islam, the Crusades, the Inquisition, the French Revolution and Communism, Hollywood, the Charismatic Movement and, you guessed it, the Zionist State of Israel. Can you guess the identity of the woman who wears red and purple and sits on 7 hills, laughing as she is drunk with the blood of the saints? 🥲
Interestingly enough, both Rome And Jerusalem Sit on Seven Hills.....
Ehhh, I've heard this arguement before. I am 99% sure Rome was famously referred to as "the city on 7 hills" around the time of John. Furthermore I would say:
It does not make sense to depict Jerusalem as a woman sitting on a beast with seven heads, interpreted as a city which sits upon seven hills. If the woman is a city, and the city sits upon seven hills (17:9), then the woman is Rome (Septicollis Roma). How can we say Jerusalem ever sat on Rome? Rome was ruling over Jerusalem, and then destroyed it! The most natural interpretation would be, Rome sits on seven hills.
Jerusalem, the City of David, Zion, is recognized by all except Dispensationalists as a figure or type of the church. If Jerusalem is, later on in the Old Testament, depicted as a harlot, unfaithful woman, dressed in scarlet, etc., we should understand this in the New Testament to be descriptive, not of the city of Jerusalem, but of a false and heretical church -- Rome.
This would be in keeping with the description given of the Bride of Christ in this same book: it is not a faithful city, but the true church of Jesus Christ. Because of the contrast present between the two, the whore and the bride, it is not descriptive of a faithful city vs. a faithless city, but of the true church vs. the false church.
The Romish church has persecuted far more than Jerusalem ever did -- it is she who has been made "drunk with the blood of the saints." Rev. 18:24 does not say "all the blood of all the prophets," but "the blood of prophets, and of saints, and of all that were slain upon the earth" -- which, if taken literally, would apply to neither Rome nor Jerusalem. But Papal Rome has, through the centuries, been guilty of the blood of those performing the prophetic (i.e., preaching) ministry. Although the Jews of Jerusalem sought to kill our Lord, it was only by the Roman power and authority that He was crucified. They literally annoyed Rome into doing it!
Great answer - I had just heard both , and leaned toward your position. Thanks for confirming my suspicions.