Sorry, but FUCK this bow tied pig. Based solely on his positions, esp that $cience shouldn't be debated because he and his fellow well compensated pigs said so, he deserves whatever he gets. His family members, too. The information and data are out there...many of us knew this and said so...but just as many look the other way because $$$$$.
The brainwashing and egomania in academia is unparalleled, maybe in all history. Look at forensic psychiatry for instance. They are gonna take a killer, lock him in a cage, force them to talk to a shrink who fills out a checklist, gives them a diagnosis, force feeds them drugs and expects to "fix them", against their will, so they can be released. HISTORIC arrogance. Then they're shocked when predators are exactly the same as before, just more angry and more devious.
If you genuinely felt other people were too stupid and uneducated to understand even the premise of the debate topic, would you get involved? Do you debate chess openings with pigeons?
I'm not defending him. Maybe he won't debate because he knows he's wrong, if only subconsciously, and doesn't want to lose funding whilst looking the fool, idk.
Sorry, but FUCK this bow tied pig. Based solely on his positions, esp that $cience shouldn't be debated because he and his fellow well compensated pigs said so, he deserves whatever he gets. His family members, too. The information and data are out there...many of us knew this and said so...but just as many look the other way because $$$$$.
Some of us assumed that public wearing of bow ties is a comm.
We are dealing with people who operate a maritime law system of slavery.
“Bow” being the front of a ship. If it’s “tied”, it would be under their full control at a dock.
Tucker stopped being Cucker when he dropped the bow tie.
Also this dude looks like he’s Stephen King’s brother in AIDS.
The brainwashing and egomania in academia is unparalleled, maybe in all history. Look at forensic psychiatry for instance. They are gonna take a killer, lock him in a cage, force them to talk to a shrink who fills out a checklist, gives them a diagnosis, force feeds them drugs and expects to "fix them", against their will, so they can be released. HISTORIC arrogance. Then they're shocked when predators are exactly the same as before, just more angry and more devious.
If you genuinely felt other people were too stupid and uneducated to understand even the premise of the debate topic, would you get involved? Do you debate chess openings with pigeons?
I'm not defending him. Maybe he won't debate because he knows he's wrong, if only subconsciously, and doesn't want to lose funding whilst looking the fool, idk.