No! At this point, giving democrats a chance to move Jeffries in as SOTH is just stupid. Trump knows this. Leave Johnson alone until AFTER Trump is certified. THEN move to oust Johnson.
There is NO way we’d get a Jeffries Speaker when we have a voting majority. That’s silly. Any Republican that votes for a Dem speaker would have holy hell to pay.
Don't fool yourself. RINOs have been doing it for years and they're still there. Plus, we have some Republicans like Massie, Roy, and others who won't vote for Johnson. They could vote "present" or just not show up and swing the majority vote.
It would be rational and realistic to consider that you and I probably know less than 25% of the reality that goes on in that world, in the political sphere and in Wash DC. All we get to see is the surface narratives, those that come through on the propaganda media, alt media and social media. Unless you are an intern over there at DC, in one of the parties or even in the office of an independent.
In which case, you probably know up to 28% of what actually goes on.
It makes no sense to gainsay the person you put there to represent your interests when you have only a fraction of the information they have, and they have mountains more information (and experience) than you.
Nothing wrong with having a different opinion (i.e. to Trump), but a modicum of situational awareness seems likely to inspire reflection and a big swing towards 'benefit of the doubt', when I "doubt".
Gotta listen to the boss on this one.
The boss is wrong on this one.
No! At this point, giving democrats a chance to move Jeffries in as SOTH is just stupid. Trump knows this. Leave Johnson alone until AFTER Trump is certified. THEN move to oust Johnson.
There is NO way we’d get a Jeffries Speaker when we have a voting majority. That’s silly. Any Republican that votes for a Dem speaker would have holy hell to pay.
Don't fool yourself. RINOs have been doing it for years and they're still there. Plus, we have some Republicans like Massie, Roy, and others who won't vote for Johnson. They could vote "present" or just not show up and swing the majority vote.
It would be rational and realistic to consider that you and I probably know less than 25% of the reality that goes on in that world, in the political sphere and in Wash DC. All we get to see is the surface narratives, those that come through on the propaganda media, alt media and social media. Unless you are an intern over there at DC, in one of the parties or even in the office of an independent. In which case, you probably know up to 28% of what actually goes on.
It makes no sense to gainsay the person you put there to represent your interests when you have only a fraction of the information they have, and they have mountains more information (and experience) than you.
Nothing wrong with having a different opinion (i.e. to Trump), but a modicum of situational awareness seems likely to inspire reflection and a big swing towards 'benefit of the doubt', when I "doubt".