1
notklausschwab 1 point ago +1 / -0

Congrats. But "proof" it ain't. Meaning the photo and/or the relationship between Kinzinger's wife and pence. Low threshold. Proof requires a lot more than that, imo.

2
notklausschwab 2 points ago +2 / -0

Obviously proof that Trump is corrupt.

Sarcasm. Because its not proof.

Neither is what is presented by OP proof.

1
notklausschwab 1 point ago +1 / -0

Regardless of the photo, what you consider to be proof is flimsy at the very best.

It appears that you have set yourself an extremely low bar for proof and evidence and just abandoned altogether the option for critical thinking.

Lifestyle choice, I guess, but not one I'm keen on adopting.

0
notklausschwab 0 points ago +2 / -2

Yeah, and that photo with Epstein is proof that Donald Trump is a Cabal stooge, right? /sarc

<Facepalm>

If you consider this proof, you'll swallow anything.... .

-1
notklausschwab -1 points ago +2 / -3

I don't know why so many here, have trouble

Because they use their brains, apply logic and critical thinking

1
notklausschwab 1 point ago +1 / -0

Excellent points.

I should have been more specifics. I was addressing specifically the situation where someone has been harrassing some people on GAW via direct message, never posting in the daylight, as it were.

Perhaps 'Troll" was not the best word. Possibly 'stalker' would have been more applicable.

Apologies for not being clear, but getting your Discourse on Trolling is a great outcome!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0