It would be rational and realistic to consider that you and I probably know less than 25% of the reality that goes on in that world, in the political sphere and in Wash DC. All we get to see is the surface narratives, those that come through on the propaganda media, alt media and social media. Unless you are an intern over there at DC, in one of the parties or even in the office of an independent.
In which case, you probably know up to 28% of what actually goes on.
It makes no sense to gainsay the person you put there to represent your interests when you have only a fraction of the information they have, and they have mountains more information (and experience) than you.
Nothing wrong with having a different opinion (i.e. to Trump), but a modicum of situational awareness seems likely to inspire reflection and a big swing towards 'benefit of the doubt', when I "doubt".
Gotta listen to the boss on this one.
The boss is wrong on this one.
It would be rational and realistic to consider that you and I probably know less than 25% of the reality that goes on in that world, in the political sphere and in Wash DC. All we get to see is the surface narratives, those that come through on the propaganda media, alt media and social media. Unless you are an intern over there at DC, in one of the parties or even in the office of an independent. In which case, you probably know up to 28% of what actually goes on.
It makes no sense to gainsay the person you put there to represent your interests when you have only a fraction of the information they have, and they have mountains more information (and experience) than you.
Nothing wrong with having a different opinion (i.e. to Trump), but a modicum of situational awareness seems likely to inspire reflection and a big swing towards 'benefit of the doubt', when I "doubt".