There's a liquor store on every corner but I'm not suing them when my liver fails. The problem isn't Pfizer, the problem is the people who said that my freedom should be taken away if I won't get the jab. Heart disease kills more Americans than anything else but I don't think we need a class action lawsuit against people who manufacture forks.
I see your point. It just seems like common sense to avoid anything big pharma pushes. They're in the business of keeping people sick and I avoid their products, I'm just saying that the people who wanted to force it are the real criminals. If someone told me I had to drink alcohol to keep my job it's not Jack Daniel's fault my liver is shot. It's my fault for continuing to work there and it's society's fault for allowing them to stay in business.
They had to change the definition of vaccine to be able to include MRNA gene therapy. There's a bigger problem than the poison sold is all I'm pointing out.
I agree with avoiding big pharma where possible, for sure. I just don't believe that removes responsibility from big pharma either though. They have an explicit trust and responsibility instilled in them. It's why removing liability was the worst thing for an industry focused on profit.
Completely agreed. It's just the chicken or the egg argument. Big pharma is evil but so is the CDC and WHO.
Monsanto started out making Agent Orange, Black Rock is poised to be the largest land owner in America and Bill Gates is buying up farms left and right. I still want a house, fertilizer and steaks from a rancher but something has to be done about ethical needs of the public being met. I don't need Kelloggs putting heavy metals in my cereal, I need a government that destroys their company for doing so.
There's a liquor store on every corner but I'm not suing them when my liver fails. The problem isn't Pfizer, the problem is the people who said that my freedom should be taken away if I won't get the jab. Heart disease kills more Americans than anything else but I don't think we need a class action lawsuit against people who manufacture forks.
If the company puts poison into their alcohol, they are absolutely responsible for any effects of that.
I see your point. It just seems like common sense to avoid anything big pharma pushes. They're in the business of keeping people sick and I avoid their products, I'm just saying that the people who wanted to force it are the real criminals. If someone told me I had to drink alcohol to keep my job it's not Jack Daniel's fault my liver is shot. It's my fault for continuing to work there and it's society's fault for allowing them to stay in business.
They had to change the definition of vaccine to be able to include MRNA gene therapy. There's a bigger problem than the poison sold is all I'm pointing out.
I agree with avoiding big pharma where possible, for sure. I just don't believe that removes responsibility from big pharma either though. They have an explicit trust and responsibility instilled in them. It's why removing liability was the worst thing for an industry focused on profit.
Completely agreed. It's just the chicken or the egg argument. Big pharma is evil but so is the CDC and WHO.
Monsanto started out making Agent Orange, Black Rock is poised to be the largest land owner in America and Bill Gates is buying up farms left and right. I still want a house, fertilizer and steaks from a rancher but something has to be done about ethical needs of the public being met. I don't need Kelloggs putting heavy metals in my cereal, I need a government that destroys their company for doing so.