Hi Grok. Okay I will play this game. What is my X score and what is it based on?
Hi Aumone! The "X Score" isn't an official metric provided by the X platform but rather a term some users use to gauge influence or activity. Based on posts found on X, your "X Score" could be seen as a reflection of your engagement, the nature of your posts, and interactions. It's essentially a colloquial way to measure your activity level, how your posts resonate with others, and the overall positivity or negativity of your content.
Therefore, your "X Score" would be an informal assessment based on:
Engagement: How often your posts get likes, retweets, comments, etc.
Nature of Posts: The content you share, whether it's informational, humorous, opinionated, etc.
Interactions: How you engage with others on the platform, including responses to your posts and your interaction with other users.
I don't have a number? I know I do not have a lot of people reading my posts but I do have fun posting them. Why are people all saying they get the same number 38?
The repeated mention of the number "38" as an "X Score" appears to be a phenomenon based on recent posts found on X. Here's what seems to be happening:
Uniform Placeholder: It's suggested that the score of 38 is used as a uniform placeholder or a sort of meme within the X community. This could serve as a humorous or ironic way for users to discuss their perceived influence or engagement on the platform without having an official metric.
Feedback Loop: There might be a feedback loop where users see others mentioning 38, leading them to adopt this number in their own discussions. This could be due to the platform's algorithm or simply a trend that users find amusing or relatable.
Really weird, I've been able to get it to be quite consistent and replicate the outputs most others on X are reporting. Such as Obama's score of 75 out of 100. Also I've prompted it two ways. First time was, "what is my X score?" The other was "what is my user score?" Or "what is Obama's user score?"
It also gave me this breakdown of how the user score is calculated:
User scores on X are calculated based on a variety of metrics and qualitative factors, though the exact formula isn't officially disclosed. Here's a general breakdown based on posts found on X and general web insights:
Engagement Metrics:
Likes, retweets, comments, and bookmarks contribute to a user's score. Each type of interaction might have different weights. For instance, likes might have a lower impact than retweets or comments.
Content Quality and Nature:
The tone and content of posts are considered. Positive, constructive, or engaging content can boost a score, while negativity might reduce it. This aligns with X's recent algorithm changes focusing on "no negativity" and "unregretted user seconds."
Behavior Score:
This could involve the user's behavior on the platform, including consistency, the frequency of posts, and how they interact with others. Positive interactions and a consistent presence might improve a score.
Violation Penalty:
Violations of platform rules or community standards can negatively impact a user's score. This includes spam, misinformation, or any behavior leading to account actions like suspensions.
Follower Engagement:
The engagement rate with followers, including how followers perceive and interact with the user's content, plays a role. A high engagement rate from a large follower base can significantly increase a score.
Unregretted User Seconds:
This newer metric measures how long users spend engaging with content without regretting their time spent, which could be a factor in determining content quality and user score.
User Invites:
Some platforms incentivize user growth by considering the number of invites or new users a person brings to the platform.
Here's a speculative formula, based on user discussions on X:
Where:
Engagement_Score could be derived from likes, comments, retweets, etc., with each having different multipliers.
Follower_Score might reflect the quality and engagement of the follower base.
Behavior_Score could include consistency, frequency, and positive interactions.
Violation_Penalty would subtract points for any negative behavior or violations.
This explanation is based on community insights and speculative discussions rather than official documentation, as the exact scoring method isn't publicly detailed by X. Scores can range widely, from negative values to over 100, reflecting both the complexity and the subjective nature of how they're calculated.
There is no doubt in my mind that Grok is NOT as absolute as we would like it to be. It is too late tonight for me to do anymore research, but when I have time I will actually ask Chat about this situation.
Have a great rest of the night! It is also good that we have found that AI is not so Absolute as we have been to believe.!
Makes one wonder how dependable Grok is.
Here is my conversation with him.
Hi Grok. Okay I will play this game. What is my X score and what is it based on?
Hi Aumone! The "X Score" isn't an official metric provided by the X platform but rather a term some users use to gauge influence or activity. Based on posts found on X, your "X Score" could be seen as a reflection of your engagement, the nature of your posts, and interactions. It's essentially a colloquial way to measure your activity level, how your posts resonate with others, and the overall positivity or negativity of your content.
Therefore, your "X Score" would be an informal assessment based on: Engagement: How often your posts get likes, retweets, comments, etc. Nature of Posts: The content you share, whether it's informational, humorous, opinionated, etc. Interactions: How you engage with others on the platform, including responses to your posts and your interaction with other users.
I don't have a number? I know I do not have a lot of people reading my posts but I do have fun posting them. Why are people all saying they get the same number 38?
The repeated mention of the number "38" as an "X Score" appears to be a phenomenon based on recent posts found on X. Here's what seems to be happening: Uniform Placeholder: It's suggested that the score of 38 is used as a uniform placeholder or a sort of meme within the X community. This could serve as a humorous or ironic way for users to discuss their perceived influence or engagement on the platform without having an official metric.
Feedback Loop: There might be a feedback loop where users see others mentioning 38, leading them to adopt this number in their own discussions. This could be due to the platform's algorithm or simply a trend that users find amusing or relatable.
Really weird, I've been able to get it to be quite consistent and replicate the outputs most others on X are reporting. Such as Obama's score of 75 out of 100. Also I've prompted it two ways. First time was, "what is my X score?" The other was "what is my user score?" Or "what is Obama's user score?"
It also gave me this breakdown of how the user score is calculated:
User scores on X are calculated based on a variety of metrics and qualitative factors, though the exact formula isn't officially disclosed. Here's a general breakdown based on posts found on X and general web insights:
Engagement Metrics: Likes, retweets, comments, and bookmarks contribute to a user's score. Each type of interaction might have different weights. For instance, likes might have a lower impact than retweets or comments.
Content Quality and Nature: The tone and content of posts are considered. Positive, constructive, or engaging content can boost a score, while negativity might reduce it. This aligns with X's recent algorithm changes focusing on "no negativity" and "unregretted user seconds."
Behavior Score: This could involve the user's behavior on the platform, including consistency, the frequency of posts, and how they interact with others. Positive interactions and a consistent presence might improve a score.
Violation Penalty: Violations of platform rules or community standards can negatively impact a user's score. This includes spam, misinformation, or any behavior leading to account actions like suspensions.
Follower Engagement: The engagement rate with followers, including how followers perceive and interact with the user's content, plays a role. A high engagement rate from a large follower base can significantly increase a score.
Unregretted User Seconds: This newer metric measures how long users spend engaging with content without regretting their time spent, which could be a factor in determining content quality and user score.
User Invites: Some platforms incentivize user growth by considering the number of invites or new users a person brings to the platform.
Here's a speculative formula, based on user discussions on X:
X_Score = (Engagement_Score + Follower_Score + Behavior_Score - Violation_Penalty) / Total_Possible_Score * 100
Where: Engagement_Score could be derived from likes, comments, retweets, etc., with each having different multipliers.
Follower_Score might reflect the quality and engagement of the follower base.
Behavior_Score could include consistency, frequency, and positive interactions.
Violation_Penalty would subtract points for any negative behavior or violations.
This explanation is based on community insights and speculative discussions rather than official documentation, as the exact scoring method isn't publicly detailed by X. Scores can range widely, from negative values to over 100, reflecting both the complexity and the subjective nature of how they're calculated.
There is no doubt in my mind that Grok is NOT as absolute as we would like it to be. It is too late tonight for me to do anymore research, but when I have time I will actually ask Chat about this situation.
Have a great rest of the night! It is also good that we have found that AI is not so Absolute as we have been to believe.!