Taxes are unconstitutional. - The Great Awakening

253

Taxes are unconstitutional. (twitter.com)

posted 3 days ago by Island_Photo 3 days ago by Island_Photo +254 / -1

69 comments

69 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (69)

sorted by:

▲ 2 ▼

– Qled 2 points 2 days ago +2 / -0

From memory I recall that during a court-case the judge rules that the 16th did not grant new taxing power.

Stanton v. Baltic Mining Co. (1916) said that the 16th amendment did not grant congress new powers (they have always had the power to levy taxes), but that congress could exercise this power without need for apportionment.

Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. (1895) was the reason why the 16th amendment exists. This court case stuck down certain taxes, because they were not apportioned to the people in the individual states

16th was never ratified. The amendment is not part of the Constitution. It has no function in law, or consequences in law. Null and void. This is well documented to be the case.

Yeah, I'm going to need proof on that. From what I understand, there were some procedural oddities, but the 16th amendment was ratified by 42 states, and only 36 were needed. Which states did not pass it? There was a case (United States v. Thomas (1986)) where someone tried to say income taxes were not constitutional, and that was shot down.

IRS is Puerto Rico based for a reason. And so is the FED. Mainland controlled by possession. You gotta love the irony in that.

What are you talking about? The headquarters for the IRS are based in Washington D.C.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q