It’s insane that so many people believe that anything digital can be secure. At this point people should just assume that the U.S., China, and Russia have the computing power to slice through bitcoin as well as things that have 1000% more encryption.
It’s insane that so many people believe that anything digital can be secure. At this point people should just assume that the U.S., China, and Russia have the computing power to slice through bitcoin as well as things that have 1000% more encryption.
Nah, I don’t think that. It wasn’t my question.
“Can be secured against a wider variety of actions”, including known vulnerabilities, though, yes, potentially.
I know, and I didn’t mean to imply that. I’m just speaking to the bitcoin situation in general.
No worries. I do think it has a place, but making it the largest egg in the basket may or may not be a great idea.
TBD.