The body language of the agent called off was a blatant WTF with arms out. What got me about the over-the-shoulder driver shooter was his speed to turn back and look ahead like 'it wasn't me'.
I read somewhere else that using today's improved techniques to enhance a photo, that the agent driver shooting with his left hand over his right shoulder is really the top of the passenger's head/hair next to him with the sunlight hitting it, instead of a human arm.
It looks like that to me. I could be wrong, but that's what I see.
+1 The video in the main post here is Cooper’s and others’ thoughts from the later 1980s until 1993.
From 1994 on forward he said that the emulsion was scraped or erased from part of the film obscuring the driver’s hand. The disagreement with the top of the passengers head idea is that this part of the film looks too bright to be the top of a person’s head reflecting sunlight.
+1 The video in the main post here is Cooper’s and others’ from the later 1980s.
From 1994 or ‘95 on forward he said that the emulsion was scraped or erased from part of the film obscuring the driver’s hand. The disagreement with the top of the passengers head idea is that this part of the film looks too bright to be the top of a person’s head reflecting sunlight.
The body language of the agent called off was a blatant WTF with arms out. What got me about the over-the-shoulder driver shooter was his speed to turn back and look ahead like 'it wasn't me'.
I read somewhere else that using today's improved techniques to enhance a photo, that the agent driver shooting with his left hand over his right shoulder is really the top of the passenger's head/hair next to him with the sunlight hitting it, instead of a human arm.
It looks like that to me. I could be wrong, but that's what I see.
A tragedy. The death of Camelot.
+1 The video in the main post here is Cooper’s and others’ thoughts from the later 1980s until 1993.
From 1994 on forward he said that the emulsion was scraped or erased from part of the film obscuring the driver’s hand. The disagreement with the top of the passengers head idea is that this part of the film looks too bright to be the top of a person’s head reflecting sunlight.
Bill’s narrative around 51:20 https://rumble.com/v1yawx0-kennedy-the-sacrificed-king-bill-cooper.html?playlist_id=c3QowPestEw
I give a +1 for bringing up this point of view. We might know the answer thanks to the President soon!
Bill made a few errors. Dallas is not right on the 33rd degree latitude, but the symbolism is all there in the video.
+1 The video in the main post here is Cooper’s and others’ from the later 1980s.
From 1994 or ‘95 on forward he said that the emulsion was scraped or erased from part of the film obscuring the driver’s hand. The disagreement with the top of the passengers head idea is that this part of the film looks too bright to be the top of a person’s head reflecting sunlight.
I think your explanation makes a lot of sense.