https://makismd.substack.com/p/news-alberta-government-covid-19
Italics added below.
The Alberta government’s newly, albeit quietly, released COVID-19 response review has made waves with its bold recommendations, especially its call for an immediate halt to the use of the novel, modified RNA COVID-19 vaccines particularly for healthy children and teenagers. This critical report, commissioned by Premier Danielle Smith, uncovers alarming gaps in the data used to authorize these vaccines and raises serious concerns about their safety and efficacy.
. . . Among the most striking findings of the report is the task force’s criticism of Health Canada’s decision-making process for the rushed to market novel modified RNA injections. The group points out that there were “significant gaps” in the data supporting the approval of the COVID-19 vaccines. In fact, Health Canada has failed to disclose whether a proper risk assessment was ever conducted to justify the widespread use of these vaccines in individuals under 18, particularly considering the lack of long-term clinical data.
One of the most disturbing aspects highlighted in the review is the data from Pfizer’s post-authorization trial. The report reveals that 1,223 deaths and 42,086 injuries were reported within just four days of vaccination. Notably, nearly half of these adverse events occurred in individuals aged 18-50—those at negligible risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes. This troubling information calls into question the overall safety profile of the vaccines, especially in young and healthy populations.
The report also discusses the known risks associated with the lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) used to deliver the modified RNA and spike protein into cells. These synthetic fat molecules have a well-documented toxicity profile, and there are concerns about the long-term health impacts of repeated doses. Furthermore, the review raises alarms over the increased risk of myocarditis and pericarditis, two heart conditions that can have lifelong and potentially fatal consequences, particularly for young individuals.
(more)
You hit on one of the most important elements of that whole fear campaign and a hot button issue for me.
I have some level of compassion for the weak minded who gave into fear, more compassion for those who got the jab in order to keep their job and provide for their family.
But I have nothing but contempt for the parents who got that damned shot for their children. By the time it was approved for kids, we had good data showing that C19 lethality for children was in the same realm as getting eaten by a land shark.
And I can think of few other responsibilities of a parent than making proper risk analyses for their children. The parents that got their kid(s) that shot failed mightily.
Thank you for being one of the good/great ones, GW. And glad to hear that the wife came to her senses at the 11th hour.