For context:
In Q179, Q reposted an anon's incorrect interpretation of his previous post (#178).
And now we have a sticky that confuses people who are new (or ignorant) and don't know better.
Yeah, that's what I thought too. It's been deported for removal, but I thought I just go for de-stickying. Our loose guideline is to de-sticky at 150 post votes anyway.
Exactly u/queue-anon.
Yeah sorry to be a dick to one of my favorite mods u/bubble_bursts but is this post some kind of a test?
If not then it's a Festival of Ignorance because the title is prima facie FALSE. Like what are we even doing here?
Q179
"Good guy (pilot of helicopter).
Bad guy (pilot of plane)."
"Bad guy intercepts message due to rogue operator embedded in tactical observation unit and takes out Good guy by top down invisible attack."
5:5 or nah?
u/#q179
For context:
In Q179, Q reposted an anon's incorrect interpretation of his previous post (#178).
And now we have a sticky that confuses people who are new (or ignorant) and don't know better.
No worries fren, always call out when something is wrong. This was meant to be a research post, as I just explained in another comment
Or, perhaps rogue cabal operator took over the plane remotely?
Black boxes will verify unless they were also hacked and deleted
I'm going to de-sticky this post.
It's a nice thread imo. We're doing some research!
I think the OP is good! except for that one inaccuracy. Digging is good. Research is divine, but this mistake was glaring.
Yeah, that's what I thought too. It's been deported for removal, but I thought I just go for de-stickying. Our loose guideline is to de-sticky at 150 post votes anyway.
Did I get this decision right?
Works for me, we can continue research as it doesn't need stickied for that.
Thanks anon
Check my post I just edited it with some notes I had from way back then.