While career bureaucrats prepared orientation packets and welcome memos, DOGE's team was already deep inside the payment systems. No committees. No approvals. No red tape. Just four coders with unprecedented access and algorithms ready to run.
"The beautiful thing about payment systems," noted a transition official watching their screens, "is that they don't lie. You can spin policy all day long, but money leaves a trail."
That trail led to staggering discoveries. Programs marked as independent revealed coordinated funding streams. Grants labeled as humanitarian aid showed curious detours through complex networks. Black budgets once shrouded in secrecy began to unravel under algorithmic scrutiny.
By 6 AM, Treasury's career officials began arriving for work. They found systems they thought impenetrable already mapped. Networks they believed hidden already exposed. Power structures built over decades revealed in hours.
Their traditional defenses—slow-walking decisions, leaking damaging stories, stonewalling requests—proved useless against an opponent moving faster than their systems could react. By the time they drafted their first memo objecting to this breach, three more systems had already been mapped.
That was some great writing. I really thought it was fiction for a second! (edit: someone in the comments there claimed it was fictional. Like, did Springfield OH really fix the potholes in a day? I couldn't find concrete proof either, so some parts I'll reserve judgement.)
I wonder if these kids were typing with "upgraded" fingers like in Ghost in the Shell? lol
Nice easy read. Sometimes I’ll start to read a journalist article and fifty to hundred words later I don’t even have a clue of what the Hell they are writing about. Guarantee they are a Democrat
Reminds me of the Biden Crime Family, how many LLCs did they have, how many bank accts did they have, what product or service did they provide to receive vast amounts of money?
The substack presents stories, purportedly to share 'truth. But this seems different from a factual report. It could very easily be a short story, a narrative, written to illustrate what the author thinks might have happened, etc.
In other words, it's literature.
Hard to rely on it as a factual report, and hard to separate the fact from the fiction.
I mean, in the opening paragraphs:
"We're in," Akash Bobba messaged the team. "All of it."
A snippet:
While career bureaucrats prepared orientation packets and welcome memos, DOGE's team was already deep inside the payment systems. No committees. No approvals. No red tape. Just four coders with unprecedented access and algorithms ready to run.
"The beautiful thing about payment systems," noted a transition official watching their screens, "is that they don't lie. You can spin policy all day long, but money leaves a trail."
That trail led to staggering discoveries. Programs marked as independent revealed coordinated funding streams. Grants labeled as humanitarian aid showed curious detours through complex networks. Black budgets once shrouded in secrecy began to unravel under algorithmic scrutiny.
By 6 AM, Treasury's career officials began arriving for work. They found systems they thought impenetrable already mapped. Networks they believed hidden already exposed. Power structures built over decades revealed in hours.
Their traditional defenses—slow-walking decisions, leaking damaging stories, stonewalling requests—proved useless against an opponent moving faster than their systems could react. By the time they drafted their first memo objecting to this breach, three more systems had already been mapped.
That was some great writing. I really thought it was fiction for a second! (edit: someone in the comments there claimed it was fictional. Like, did Springfield OH really fix the potholes in a day? I couldn't find concrete proof either, so some parts I'll reserve judgement.)
I wonder if these kids were typing with "upgraded" fingers like in Ghost in the Shell? lol
Exactly. Also, take a look at the substack itself, and the other substacks or posts it has written.
I would say that its fictionalized drama based on a reading of reported facts.
It certainly not a factual report.
BASED ARTICLE and BASED CODERS
....thnx for the article LINK...SHARING ON OTHER SOCIALS !!!
Absolutely Awesome! Thank you! 🛠️
Nice easy read. Sometimes I’ll start to read a journalist article and fifty to hundred words later I don’t even have a clue of what the Hell they are writing about. Guarantee they are a Democrat
GOD BLESS President Trump, his family, his security team, employees and most of all, the citizens of this nation 🙏🇺🇸
Good read, thank you.
Reminds me of the Biden Crime Family, how many LLCs did they have, how many bank accts did they have, what product or service did they provide to receive vast amounts of money?
Good read.
Note: Its not an article. Its a story.
"TRUTH SHINES THRU STORY"
The substack presents stories, purportedly to share 'truth. But this seems different from a factual report. It could very easily be a short story, a narrative, written to illustrate what the author thinks might have happened, etc.
In other words, it's literature.
Hard to rely on it as a factual report, and hard to separate the fact from the fiction.
I mean, in the opening paragraphs:
"We're in," Akash Bobba messaged the team. "All of it."
How does EKO know this?