This tactic started with [Hussein] and will continue until [they]'ve effectively banned firearms.

Unless, of course, The People don't let them get away with it.

The article mentions, but only in passing, that hardball (non-hollowpoint, full-metal-jacket) bullets are prone to over-penetration, meaning they are more likely to pass through a person, a wall, a door, or whatever they hit and continue on -- to possibly kill or injure someone who is next in the bullet's path.

THIS makes hardball ammo LESS safe in urban environments. You might stop your assailant with hardball ammo (although it might take several shots more than it would with hollowpoints, as a hardball bullet that exits the target and continues on takes much of its energy with it; hollow points are more likely to dump ALL of their energy in the target while also creating a wider wound channel and more hydrostatic shock) but you might also kill an adult or a child in the next room with those same bullets.

So when a criminal gets back up and kills me because my ammo was ineffective, can my family sue these morons?

I, a liberal democrat, am about to personally start rounding up the man-buns and blue-hairs, I'm so sick of this crap.

NJ has had a ban on hollow point ammunition outside the home for ages. This is slightly poor journalism (I think he picked up a poorly written AP report as other sites are reporting it as a new ban)

Not defending NJ, but all that happened was that a lawsuit was filed stating that the ban is unconstitutional...

(There is plenty of stupidity around the ban with liberals talking of banning the "cop killer" ammo, etc though)