Becoming Brigitte: Candace Owens x Xavier Poussard
(www.youtube.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (71)
sorted by:
Do you think there's no cost to what she does? Do you think she should work hard, employ people, pay them, make content (LOTS of which is available freely on YouTube), but she shouldn't make a living from what she does? Or maybe you think she or her husband should work full time to support their family and then do this truth telling on the side for free? (As if that would even be possible in terms of time.) And then we wonder why journalism, music, literature, television, etc, are in the state they are--because people can't make a living doing those things even if they love them without selling their souls to some machine to make them viable.
If you want to do all of that, great! Create a website, curate it, fill it with compelling content, and send me the link. I'll be happy to watch it.
Thanks Chuck.
No.
No.
Or maybe you think she or her husband should work full time to support their family and then do this truth telling on the side for free?
No.
BUT, I am exceedingly skeptical of individuals who seem to be much more focused on building a business brand WHILE touting themselves as "unfiltered truth tellers".
I support content creators who should be paid for the hard work they do. This does not mean that ANYONE who makes money while telling everyone they are 'unfiltered truth tellers' is automatically honestly motivated.
She should make money. She can make money. But the great awakening, she is not.
Since the dawn of Q, 'telling truth' has become a big business. Plus, there are many, many operations deployed by the bad actors to infiltrate the 'truth sphere', and work controlled opposition and gate keeping.
I used to be ignorant of this concept. But I am no longer.
So, there is a big difference between making a living, even making a decent living, and making "I'm telling you unfiltered truth" into a big glossy business, especially when it is NOT 'unfiltered'.
There are bona fide Awakening operations out there that make a living off the support they get, but who do not restrict access to "truth". I contrast them with what Owens is doing. In addition, I look this particular issue in conjunction with other aspects I consider to be red flags with Owens.
It's OK to be skeptical. It's NOT ok to just give someone a pass just because they tout themselves as truth telling.
A final note, Chuck. The reason why artists cannot make a living in these areas without "selling their souls" to the machine is because the machine infiltrated and took over and corrupted these areas to the power-concentrating and tyrannical ends.
This is changing. Firstly, with the discrediting and destruction of "entertainment" and the corporate mainstream media complex, and secondly, with the freedom that the internet has fostered starting in the last few decades, more and more content creators are able to establish themselves, create a niche, and work independently.
A question: Do you think that the bad actors, black hats and cabal are OK with this trend? What do you think they might do in order to try to derail this trend, or limit the loss of their control over the information sphere?
That's what we need to ask ourselves at this juncture in the information war. We're at war. Make no mistake.
You and I are in agreement, fren. I'm right with you vis a vis controlled opposition. But I don't think Candace is that. At least not at this point. But I thought Jordan Sather was okay when I was one of the first couple hundred following him on YouTube before I dumped him in short order when I figured out he was a sower of discord. We all have our internal God-given discernment. Normies ignore that little voice. But most of us here have been honing it for quite some time. Candace passes the muster for the moment for me. I'm not subscribed to her channel because I have limited time and, frankly, limited interest in most of what she focuses on. But I appreciate her work digging into the pasts of people like Kamala Harris and Brigitte Macron. She's the perfect one to expose Kamala. And I hope that Big Mike is next on her expose hit list. Who's going to scream "racist!", "misogynist!" when Kamala is the one opening fire on "Michelle"? I really think Big Mike is going to be what wakes a LOT of normies up. And I hope they're as pissed at the betrayal as they should be. We shall see. What a time to be alive!
And on the entertainment, I agree. I'm a literature lover who watches with astonishment as the Faulkners and Tolkiens and Brontes and Twains and Jane Austens seem to be extinct in our world. Right now the average college graduate can't read any of those books let alone write them. It's tragic. But I hope it's not permanent. We shall see.
Kek, how about that, fren!
I'm a strong fan of Jordan Sather, and a critic (or at least, I'm very suspicious) of Candace Owens.
I strongly appreciate Sather because he calls out a lot of the clickbait and scammy disinfo and grifty operations [in our sphere of activity], something that is near and dear to my heart, and which I think is a very unappreciated area of important endeavor.
I won't attempt to persuade you! but I think its also worth recognizing (in my view) that Donald Trump has been a great sower of discord.
There are two types of division in the world. One that creates division in order to conquer, undermine and destroy goodness, and one that seeks to separate good from evil so that Good can flourish and rise to victorious position.
Anyway, I think with you for CO and against JS, and me for JS and against CO, we probably have our bases covered. That's a GOOD situation, in my book. Because you and I have the same goal, generally speaking, so hopefully if and when useful ,we can learn from each other.
I'll keep an open mind of Owens, even though I am suspicious.
Thank you for your faith, patriotism, and belief in humanity. Blessings, WTFfren.