This old guy who I used to work with and was creepy af said how he used to work for a government agency and his job used to be screening the email system for images of child sexual exploitation and his face lit up when talked about it. He said all the right things, like the images were horrible and he had to report them to authorities, but his facial expressions told me that he really enjoyed it

Creepy old bastard

don't forget the FBI ran the world largest child p*rn site for a DECADE

I have had this thought more than once.

Many priests, teachers, coaches, scoutmasters, etc. take the jobs they take purely for access to kids.

What if half of the population is?

It’s true. If they really cared, they would and easily could stop it.

That’s my entire point of arguing against any photo/video/conversation/ and I will go so far as to say any consensual relationship/being used against citizens. It is unconstitutional and they are doing it themselves.

The police get to see ALL of your photos and so does the State and creepy Feds. They laugh about them and they pleasure themselves to them. Don’t think they don’t.

However, they have duped citizens to believe it is worse than murder. They have also used the media to make things way worse. We all know the media has a job to enforce an agenda. Scare the hell out of citizens and give them a perfect loophole to raid your home and seize ALL your electronics.

Back in the AOL chat days, CP was super common. The police and Feds entrap citizens, ISPs and photo storage companies like Dropbox scan your photos - to check for underage pics but what are they really doing? What if it’s your child?

Look at after 9/11, when they passed the Patriot Act. They also passed the Protect Act. The Protect Act and other acts makes possession of one picture a mandatory penalty in prison of 5, 10, 15 years. People who have accidentally saw these are scared out of their wits. I think it’s one reason for all the riots and trans movement.

These people don’t belong with violent thugs in prison.

Mandatory minimums are sketchy at best.

I don’t like the CP of course but just take an overview of the headlines and think of how they are using their tools of surveillance to send us to prison for multiple years MINIMUM for having photos/videos.

They don’t have laws against murder videos. Why not?

The Supreme Court has even said that the goal of “protecting the children” overrides a normal expectation of privacy in our own homes. These laws are SUSPECT.

While they allowed trafficking children at our own border. And fund Ukraine. It’s a joke.

"who watches the watchmen"

Remember, this was J Edgar Hoover's agency. Maybe it's time to start a parallel agency and take the old rotten one down.

We could say same meme for the media. Journalists reporting on child sex trafficking....oh, right. They bury those stories. Dream job. Running cover for powerful elite psychopathic pedophiles gives these sickos a thrill.

If they truly wanted to stop it, charge the underage person (as long as is the case) with the same penalties the offender gets, and also charge the parents.

Look at the incarceration rate and the amount of males vs females (now that we have female lawmakers it should be 50/50 right?) my point is that they haven’t stopped it at all.

And people will still swear up and down that the FBI "Pedo symbols" memo is legit...

I doubt it would be all, but some? Probably. The implications of this go deep. If the investigator is the perpetrator, then who are they arresting? How difficult is it to insert a folder on someone's computer remotely? Not at all if you have the resources of the FBI. So who knows how many people serving time for CP possession are totally innocent? And then that could potentially cause legitimate convictions of legitimate perpetrators to get tossed out since the investigators were crooked. I hope to God true justice is served in this world and not just the world to come.