Sorry to hear you are bugged. I thought you were joking (but no, not messing with people).
Because the original story / premise is clearly wrong. Taking one specific thing and blowing that up into proof or even evidence of a hypothesis is a risky business.
That's why Q emphasized mathematical certainty, by highlighting instance after instance after instance after instance of Q 'proofs' etc. Not one or two.
Sorry to hear you are bugged. I thought you were joking (but no, not messing with people).
Because the original story / premise is clearly wrong. Taking one specific thing and blowing that up into proof or even evidence of a hypothesis is a risky business.
That's why Q emphasized mathematical certainty, by highlighting instance after instance after instance after instance of Q 'proofs' etc. Not one or two.