No, they didn't. Nothing I've been reading is claiming 4,000,000 a year were getting measles before the measles vaccine.
Just to point it out, how do you think normies are going to react when you tell them that 4,000,000 a year were getting measles before the measles vaccine was invented.
Do you think that's going to make them think the measles vaccine is a bad thing?
No, I would give them the number of recorded cases, and tell them that the actual number of cases would be higher.
What I wouldn't do is just pull a number out of my ass, copy and paste some twattle, and tell them that was the truth. And then refuse to tell them where that number came from. Which is what you're doing.
So you wouldn't have any issue with the measles vaccine if it was in a separate shot?
So you wouldn't have any issue with the measles vaccine if it was in a separate shot?
They don't have the autism issue in Japan. They still use Measles vaccine.
Does that apply to the Mumps and Rubella shot?
Mumps is not deadly , can cause sterility in adult men who develop it. My nephew was conceived and born after my brother was quarantined for the mumps in college ( his 3rd child).
Rubella also has low fatality rate but can cause deafness in child if the mother develops during pregnancy. Shouldn't we be vaccinating young women before child bearing age ?
Both vaccines exist as separate also. More expensive.
Wow you are exactly correct I must have misremembered it ONLY 0.2 % Hospitalization.
Although you could never give any references for any of your bullshit . I have tired of playing. Here is you citation. Approved CE course.
"From 1989 to 1991, CDC reported 55,622 cases with 123 deaths, and 90% of cases were unvaccinated children. They stated: "Surveys in areas experiencing outbreaks among preschool-age children indicated that as few as 50% of children had been vaccinated against measles by their second birthday, and that black and Hispanic children were less likely to be age-appropriately vaccinated than were white children (CDC, Pink Book 2018.)"
Imagine that in 1989 to '91 50,060 unvaccinated cases with 123 deaths . And comes out to .2 %. Where have I heard that number before ?
What? You want actual links? That will change your mind?
Seriously, does it even matter if I give you a link? Would it change your opinion in any way?
No matter what link I give you, it all boils down to you using that 4,000,000 number that someone pulled out of their ass (because nowhere on that site you linked does it give any evidence supporting it).
The numbers I'm using are the reported cases of measles against the reported hospitalizations for measles.
Hell, go back and look at the things you've copy pasted here and do the math. See what the percentage of reported cases of measles are against the reported hospitalizations.
Wait. I should probably do that for you. Math is hard for you, as we've already established.
No, they didn't. Nothing I've been reading is claiming 4,000,000 a year were getting measles before the measles vaccine.
Just to point it out, how do you think normies are going to react when you tell them that 4,000,000 a year were getting measles before the measles vaccine was invented.
Do you think that's going to make them think the measles vaccine is a bad thing?
So you prefer to lie to them ?
You worry more about Fee Fees than truth, how liberal of you.
Not measles vaccine that is the problem. MMR is.
No, I would give them the number of recorded cases, and tell them that the actual number of cases would be higher.
What I wouldn't do is just pull a number out of my ass, copy and paste some twattle, and tell them that was the truth. And then refuse to tell them where that number came from. Which is what you're doing.
So you wouldn't have any issue with the measles vaccine if it was in a separate shot?
Does that apply to the Mumps and Rubella shot?
Are you only against combination shots?
They don't have the autism issue in Japan. They still use Measles vaccine.
Mumps is not deadly , can cause sterility in adult men who develop it. My nephew was conceived and born after my brother was quarantined for the mumps in college ( his 3rd child).
Rubella also has low fatality rate but can cause deafness in child if the mother develops during pregnancy. Shouldn't we be vaccinating young women before child bearing age ?
Both vaccines exist as separate also. More expensive.
I'm not in favor of any of them. I'm surprised that you seem to be.
Where are you getting your information that they don't have autism in Japan?
Wow you are exactly correct I must have misremembered it ONLY 0.2 % Hospitalization.
Although you could never give any references for any of your bullshit . I have tired of playing. Here is you citation. Approved CE course.
"From 1989 to 1991, CDC reported 55,622 cases with 123 deaths, and 90% of cases were unvaccinated children. They stated: "Surveys in areas experiencing outbreaks among preschool-age children indicated that as few as 50% of children had been vaccinated against measles by their second birthday, and that black and Hispanic children were less likely to be age-appropriately vaccinated than were white children (CDC, Pink Book 2018.)"
Imagine that in 1989 to '91 50,060 unvaccinated cases with 123 deaths . And comes out to .2 %. Where have I heard that number before ?
https://www.atrainceu.com/content/2-history-and-pathology-measles
You're confusing percentage of deaths again. Not percentage of hospitalizations. 🤦♀️
Imagine that , Would the likely cases needing Hospitalization in the late 1950's early 1960's be the case that were most likely to cause death ?
Try to pay attention.
No, the only way that number works out in support of your statement is if everyone hospitalized for measles died of measles.
Yeah, I already found that site. I just copy/pasted what you posted and did a search for it.
You're about two hours late and a hell of a lot of dimes short.
And your point ? You are saying this company and it's information is incorrect ?
I already told you where I got my info. You just ignored it. 🤷♀️
You say that was the case but had no receipts. Bull shit talks.
What? You want actual links? That will change your mind?
Seriously, does it even matter if I give you a link? Would it change your opinion in any way?
No matter what link I give you, it all boils down to you using that 4,000,000 number that someone pulled out of their ass (because nowhere on that site you linked does it give any evidence supporting it).
The numbers I'm using are the reported cases of measles against the reported hospitalizations for measles.
Hell, go back and look at the things you've copy pasted here and do the math. See what the percentage of reported cases of measles are against the reported hospitalizations.
Wait. I should probably do that for you. Math is hard for you, as we've already established.