Oh no she must not be trustworthy, Trump has been fooled again! /s

Forgive the sarcasm OP, but what honestly are you implying here?

Trump has put many people in positions to expose them, why not this one? It seems as though the white hats have put various benchmarks in place to determine how far we are progressing in "The great awakening". I would think that blindly trusting someone, without due diligence would be a good benchmark that we haven't really learned anything.

This is such a critical position, I don't believe he would use it to 'out' someone. Especially this person who was relatively unknown to the general public and wasn't in a position to 'fleece the US'. Prior to Chief of Staff, she was 4+ years on his campaign. If anything were to come out, he would have found it in those 4 years.

Something to pay attention to.