She said she’d seen the evidence and that it was really sick stuff. No she didn’t. That’s a HUGE lie. Everything she had, she released and it was all nothing.
If she’d actually looked at the evidence she’d have known it was bs and wouldn’t gone on tv and said it was a big deal.
However since she redacted everything and gave it to social media “influencers”, obviously she was hoping the image of people holding the binders would be “enough” to keep people sedated so this could be memory holed. This is an obvious pattern.
Just bc Trump won doesn’t mean we don’t hold officials accountable.
No. A Mcguffin is a pointless device only used to drive a plot forward. The Epstein files are evidence in a criminal case - the most prolific child sex trafficking case in American history. So it’s a poor word choice.
She said she’d seen the evidence and that it was really sick stuff. No she didn’t. That’s a HUGE lie. Everything she had, she released and it was all nothing.
If she’d actually looked at the evidence she’d have known it was bs and wouldn’t gone on tv and said it was a big deal.
However since she redacted everything and gave it to social media “influencers”, obviously she was hoping the image of people holding the binders would be “enough” to keep people sedated so this could be memory holed. This is an obvious pattern.
Just bc Trump won doesn’t mean we don’t hold officials accountable.
She has looked into the Epstein thing before. She was AG of Florida.
It's important that we know the full picture, before jumping on a bandwagon against Trump and his allies.
It kind of seems like you don't remember this post you made a few days ago? https://greatawakening.win/p/19AdgRdZuS/liz-wheeler-says-sdny-is-hiding-/c/
If she was AG in Florida, shouldn't she have known there was more stuff than what was on her desk?
Remember this is a 5D chess game playing out in real time. You, I… “us” have no clue as to how this game ends. If we take the bait too early we lose.
Just because “phase 1” felt like a nothing burger to you didn’t mean an objective wasn’t accomplished.
the files are something of a MacGuffin, it seems. Is that the right word?
No. A Mcguffin is a pointless device only used to drive a plot forward. The Epstein files are evidence in a criminal case - the most prolific child sex trafficking case in American history. So it’s a poor word choice.
to me, they seem like they are being used that way, is what im saying