Right, right. I'm seeing what I want to see. The video showing actual effort behind cleanup compared to the one that shows none. It's so clear now. Obviously, when something looks bad and isn't explainable, medieval reconstructions use foam that has been deemed too unstable to use in housing construction for restoring huge stone priceless cultural artifacts.
Not only that, but you don't provide any evidence to back anything up - like a materials list or a construction plan, or even some random politician flapping his gums - just a video you don't actually watch for content and which you just demand that everyone mindlessly accepts your perverse interpretation.
Good to know that lying to one's self and ignoring what you can see with your own eyes is still the national past time for so many of you lefties.
Shit country uses shit materials on shit roof built before building codes. Yes imagine trying to stick 10 tons of plaster to that shit today above your congregations heads. Don't fucking reply to me again retard. I said I wasn't going to waste my time on this. Blocked.
One schizo's unsourced potato quality video with no location, date, photos or additional videos is not a body of evidence for the claims being made. And I'm not digging for urkanian restoration videos or documentation to prove some random retard on the internet wrong. Cope.
Russia doesn't deny it was hit, only that it wasn't them.
All projection. You posted your own potato quality video where people were exerting effort to clean up the debris because the debris had actual weight. Even IF some of the fascade in your video was foam, why would that translate to a random bombed out house?
Also, this evidence isn't presented in a vacuum. Remember when the actor president visited a location where cars were flipped over from "an explosion" but the houses within 20 feet had intact plaster and windows?
Besides all that, if you've worked with foam, you'd know it's not grey throughout unless it was dyed that way when manufactured - which wouldn't be 'cheap' for some random poor villager's home. The pieces that the potato random woman picks up were ripped and painted inside the rip, instead of exposing the actual color of the foam. Like you'd do for fake debris on a movie set.
But, of course, you just randomly froth at the mouth with magical, but baseless, knowledge that it's totally normal for a random country to use foam on both random serf houses AND multimillion dollar reconstructions of iconic architecture.
Right, right. I'm seeing what I want to see. The video showing actual effort behind cleanup compared to the one that shows none. It's so clear now. Obviously, when something looks bad and isn't explainable, medieval reconstructions use foam that has been deemed too unstable to use in housing construction for restoring huge stone priceless cultural artifacts.
Not only that, but you don't provide any evidence to back anything up - like a materials list or a construction plan, or even some random politician flapping his gums - just a video you don't actually watch for content and which you just demand that everyone mindlessly accepts your perverse interpretation.
Good to know that lying to one's self and ignoring what you can see with your own eyes is still the national past time for so many of you lefties.
"medieval reconstructions use foam"
Shit country uses shit materials on shit roof built before building codes. Yes imagine trying to stick 10 tons of plaster to that shit today above your congregations heads. Don't fucking reply to me again retard. I said I wasn't going to waste my time on this. Blocked.
Which you can't prove. Hilarious how you have to create a safe space so that reality can't get to you.
One schizo's unsourced potato quality video with no location, date, photos or additional videos is not a body of evidence for the claims being made. And I'm not digging for urkanian restoration videos or documentation to prove some random retard on the internet wrong. Cope.
Russia doesn't deny it was hit, only that it wasn't them.
https://nypost.com/2023/07/23/russian-missiles-strike-odessa-killing-one-wounding-at-least-22-and-devastating-historic-cathedral/
All projection. You posted your own potato quality video where people were exerting effort to clean up the debris because the debris had actual weight. Even IF some of the fascade in your video was foam, why would that translate to a random bombed out house?
Also, this evidence isn't presented in a vacuum. Remember when the actor president visited a location where cars were flipped over from "an explosion" but the houses within 20 feet had intact plaster and windows?
Besides all that, if you've worked with foam, you'd know it's not grey throughout unless it was dyed that way when manufactured - which wouldn't be 'cheap' for some random poor villager's home. The pieces that the potato random woman picks up were ripped and painted inside the rip, instead of exposing the actual color of the foam. Like you'd do for fake debris on a movie set.
But, of course, you just randomly froth at the mouth with magical, but baseless, knowledge that it's totally normal for a random country to use foam on both random serf houses AND multimillion dollar reconstructions of iconic architecture.