I am not so sure. The money comes from tax payers and you have 330 million people in the US Canada has only 40 million. You have 8 times the population of our country. It looks to me like Canada is paying its share.
Iceland is strategically very important. It is a primary anti-submarine/naval reconnaissance outpost. Iceland, Greenland, and. Britain is the only land covering the Atlantic from the north/arctic route.
Or we could just tell NATO good bye, that’s an option as well.
And most likely, with the highest level of probability therefore without a doubt this is by far the best option!
Roughly 1/3 of those nations were communist nations under Soviet control just 35 short years ago.
To be fair, Iceland has like 300k ppl they have nothing of value to offer to the alliance. Now the others tho, they're a bunch of leaches
Or maybe leeches, like the blood sucking worm.
I am not so sure. The money comes from tax payers and you have 330 million people in the US Canada has only 40 million. You have 8 times the population of our country. It looks to me like Canada is paying its share.
It per capita. It's Latin for per each head.
$732.00 per Canadian is less than 26% of Canada "paying its share". Canada has more land to defend. If anything they should be paying MORE.
Oh I understand their strategic value, I just don't see how they're going to cough up money for the alliance
Iceland is strategically very important. It is a primary anti-submarine/naval reconnaissance outpost. Iceland, Greenland, and. Britain is the only land covering the Atlantic from the north/arctic route.
Not only step up but make up for where they shorted us. We paid for their shorting
I’m looking at you Iceland
Americans are being exploited in NATO. No other country spends their fair share to NATO.