Why did Amy Coney Barrett choose to vote this way? Something about her has changed drastically since her confirmation hearing. Has she or her family been threatened or doxxed?
Coverage from Trump's address showed her glaring at Trump; I was very surprised.
Then she voted against what most Americans want, with all the women on the court, plus the chief justice. Is it a coincidence that she and Roberts look like family members?
SCOTUS is not about "what people want", it's about ruling on the Constitutional aspects of law. Read the article again, the money was for programs and stuff that had already been done.
It might be distasteful but regardless, America pays its debts. Going forward, however, these payments need to stop.
Did you actually read the post you replied to, or are you just spreading FUD?
She was right to vote this way, and the post outlined why.
Let's put it like this: you're a new c o at a business. The previous c e o requested construction on a building and the work was done.
They submit a bill. Now you say Hey, we're trying to cut costs, so we're just not gonna pay you.
So there may be some other mitigating factors, service may be something that we didn't like to be provided, but you the customer already agreed to pay the price.
Now I don't know about you, but I was taught to always fulfill obligations, especially when service has already been rendered. Not paying ypur bills s a big, no, no. As long as it wasn't for something illegal, there's a moral and legal obligation to pay the bills. In the grand scheme, it's not that much. Just pay the bills and move on.
Why did Amy Coney Barrett choose to vote this way? Something about her has changed drastically since her confirmation hearing. Has she or her family been threatened or doxxed?
Coverage from Trump's address showed her glaring at Trump; I was very surprised.
Then she voted against what most Americans want, with all the women on the court, plus the chief justice. Is it a coincidence that she and Roberts look like family members?
SCOTUS is not about "what people want", it's about ruling on the Constitutional aspects of law. Read the article again, the money was for programs and stuff that had already been done.
It might be distasteful but regardless, America pays its debts. Going forward, however, these payments need to stop.
“ the money was for programs and stuff that had already been done.”
But was it already done? That’s the question. They should be investigated thoroughly to determine what they spent it on.
Did you actually read the post you replied to, or are you just spreading FUD?
She was right to vote this way, and the post outlined why.
Let's put it like this: you're a new c o at a business. The previous c e o requested construction on a building and the work was done.
They submit a bill. Now you say Hey, we're trying to cut costs, so we're just not gonna pay you.
So there may be some other mitigating factors, service may be something that we didn't like to be provided, but you the customer already agreed to pay the price.
Now I don't know about you, but I was taught to always fulfill obligations, especially when service has already been rendered. Not paying ypur bills s a big, no, no. As long as it wasn't for something illegal, there's a moral and legal obligation to pay the bills. In the grand scheme, it's not that much. Just pay the bills and move on.
When did her kids come from Haiti? Asking for a friend.
Good Question!! Let's ask Jeffrey Eps... Ummm