The first link to Mr. Roberts case is just one guy who was trying to get out of paying taxes by challenging the 16th amendment. The second case I did not read through but that's the the guy who was teaching others. You'd have to read it to see what happened
i dont need to read it, challenging the 16th amendment says all i need to know.
you cant challenge the 16, courts deemed it constitutional. what you have to argue is whether or not you even have a tax liability to begin with.
if they tell you its wrong and file again, remind them under 26 usc 6201 they are authorized to make corrections based on personal knowledge. if you change your return, youre admitting to making a mistake. if they change your return, theyre committing fraud.
The first link to Mr. Roberts case is just one guy who was trying to get out of paying taxes by challenging the 16th amendment. The second case I did not read through but that's the the guy who was teaching others. You'd have to read it to see what happened
i dont need to read it, challenging the 16th amendment says all i need to know.
you cant challenge the 16, courts deemed it constitutional. what you have to argue is whether or not you even have a tax liability to begin with.
if they tell you its wrong and file again, remind them under 26 usc 6201 they are authorized to make corrections based on personal knowledge. if you change your return, youre admitting to making a mistake. if they change your return, theyre committing fraud.