The idea of "slow walking" (more to say on that in a moment) is to ENABLE people to handle it. Or, more accurately, to get it out into the public awareness through the existing major media, as news that would be impossible to embargo. Propaganda is both a science and an art, of "getting the message out." So, it has to be done in a way that makes it impossible to ignore---and done gradually enough that the Deep State frogs' gooses are cooked before they can do anything to resist.
But the disdain for "normies" is very unbecoming for any movement toward "awakening" or enlightenment. The vast masses are the ones who are being victimized by the real trolls of existence, and if we think we are in this for only ourselves, an ideological elite, we are fools. Trump knows who he is trying to save from generations of oppression and subversion---it is them. It is all of us. We have the privilege of being along for the ride. And having the opportunity to help...where we can.
There's a hint of arrogance, also. Suppose you were fortunate to have an I.Q. of 145. That would be the threshold of genius. But, compared to you, 99.63% of people would have "weak minds." Let's be less arrogant, and assume an I.Q. of 130. That would be high-functioning. Compared to that, 97.72% would have "weak minds." Or, let's be more modest and assume an I.Q. of 115. That would be above-average brightness. So then 84.13% would have "weak minds." If you were only at an I.Q. of 100, that would be perfectly normal---and 50% would have "weak minds." And, at that point, a perfectly normal person might complain about measures to accommodate "weak minds" as being beneath one's dignity or patience. I see this arrogance all the time, usually from people who aren't as bright as they think they are. "Oh, it can't be that bad. What if the weak minds were only 15.87%?" Then you would have an I.Q. of 85...and look down upon those with Down Syndrome.
Ever met such people? I saw their kind in grade school when they were segregated into the Special Education classes. They were a bit strange, gawky and clumsy. I developed a lifelong curiosity. And I have come to the lasting belief there is seldom a condition so appallingly unkind and pitiful, which should pluck at the heartstrings of anyone, so fortunate to view it from "above." There, but for the Grace of God, could go any one of us. Who is there to watch out for them? Only us. Who is there to be mindful of them? Only us. So, let us not talk about who we are pleased to call the "weak-minded" as though they were trash, only to be disregarded, whose crippling should not be tenderly responded to. Or are we a movement that delights in kicking cripples out of our way?
The idea of "slow walking" (more to say on that in a moment) is to ENABLE people to handle it. Or, more accurately, to get it out into the public awareness through the existing major media, as news that would be impossible to embargo. Propaganda is both a science and an art, of "getting the message out." So, it has to be done in a way that makes it impossible to ignore---and done gradually enough that the Deep State frogs' gooses are cooked before they can do anything to resist.
But the disdain for "normies" is very unbecoming for any movement toward "awakening" or enlightenment. The vast masses are the ones who are being victimized by the real trolls of existence, and if we think we are in this for only ourselves, an ideological elite, we are fools. Trump knows who he is trying to save from generations of oppression and subversion---it is them. It is all of us. We have the privilege of being along for the ride. And having the opportunity to help...where we can.
There's a hint of arrogance, also. Suppose you were fortunate to have an I.Q. of 145. That would be the threshold of genius. But, compared to you, 99.63% of people would have "weak minds." Let's be less arrogant, and assume an I.Q. of 130. That would be high-functioning. Compared to that, 97.72% would have "weak minds." Or, let's be more modest and assume an I.Q. of 115. That would be above-average brightness. So then 84.13% would have "weak minds." If you were only at an I.Q. of 100, that would be perfectly normal---and 50% would have "weak minds." And, at that point, a perfectly normal person might complain about measures to accommodate "weak minds" as being beneath one's dignity or patience. I see this arrogance all the time, usually from people who aren't as bright as they think they are. "Oh, it can't be that bad. What if the weak minds were only 15.87%?" Then you would have an I.Q. of 85...and look down upon those with Down Syndrome.
Ever met such people? I saw their kind in grade school when they were segregated into the Special Education classes. They were a bit strange, gawky and clumsy. I developed a lifelong curiosity. And I have come to the lasting belief there is seldom a condition so appallingly unkind and pitiful, which should pluck at the heartstrings of anyone, so fortunate to view it from "above." There, but for the Grace of God, could go any one of us. Who is there to watch out for them? Only us. Who is there to be mindful of them? Only us. So, let us not talk about who we are pleased to call the "weak-minded" as though they were trash, only to be disregarded, whose crippling should not be tenderly responded to. Or are we a movement that delights in kicking cripples out of our way?