On Inauguration Day? He didn’t say anything about it being March 4 here he’s referencing the swearing in that occurred on Inauguration Day. Where do you see any reference to March 4 being Inauguration Day instead of January 20?
People thought limiting shilling, FE, and CT to stay on topic would be good for the community. That’s the low hanging fruit. The harder thing to handle is this low effort Q-ish content that waters down the site.
Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me dozen times over a few years ummm, yeah you deserve to be played!
At least one jann here actively promotes this counter-awakening type content. I'm convinced they are connected to it probably not dissimilar to how Neon Revolt infiltrated the reddit and voat boards.
That’s why I think it’s hard to moderate. Sharing Trump’s TS posts and discussing it is great. The implication that John Roberts held a special inauguration for Trump on March 4th is interesting because of the date, but it doesn’t answer the obvious followup question of why John Roberts would be relevant to a March 4th inauguration. If that’s what is playing out, why does the existing Supreme Court have any relevance?
On Inauguration Day? He didn’t say anything about it being March 4 here he’s referencing the swearing in that occurred on Inauguration Day. Where do you see any reference to March 4 being Inauguration Day instead of January 20?
The connections here produced out of thin air are astonishing. Could that be why viewers have left in droves?
People thought limiting shilling, FE, and CT to stay on topic would be good for the community. That’s the low hanging fruit. The harder thing to handle is this low effort Q-ish content that waters down the site.
You mean like the ingersoll larpwood hype again?
Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me dozen times over a few years ummm, yeah you deserve to be played!
At least one jann here actively promotes this counter-awakening type content. I'm convinced they are connected to it probably not dissimilar to how Neon Revolt infiltrated the reddit and voat boards.
This isn't Q-ish. This is Q+ posting something interesting on truth social and looking for thoughtful insight.
That’s why I think it’s hard to moderate. Sharing Trump’s TS posts and discussing it is great. The implication that John Roberts held a special inauguration for Trump on March 4th is interesting because of the date, but it doesn’t answer the obvious followup question of why John Roberts would be relevant to a March 4th inauguration. If that’s what is playing out, why does the existing Supreme Court have any relevance?
It sure is interesting that DJT didn't post something like this a month ago right? The fake news has been trying to drive division since jan 20.
Why now? Why place that part in ALL CAPS? and why right after the March 4th address that gave a great excuse to get everyone together in DC again?
Because the MSM got him thanking Roberts on March 4th. Roberts was at the address to joint session.
I don't find that interesting at all. This didn't happen a month ago.
Pure speculation is pure speculation unless supported or sustained by facts and evidence.
Why now?
What a silly question. Because he was responding to the MSM’s reaction to him thanking Roberts at the address.