Okay, is it just me? This article presupposes that UK and the US are allies in what is going on. I think that's the first erroneous assumption, imo. Though I should clarify. The guy worked as a contractor for MI6. Yes, CIA and MI6 are allies. But that does not mean the USA and the UK are allies. These are deep state guys, imo, and the Trump ICE people have honed in on this guy. Of course there's a reason though we don't know what it is. But I think premise two in this guy's article is the most plausible: "2) He was never pro-Palestinian but was infiltrating the protest movement for the British government"
The guys argument that it's #3 seems like straight up trying to sell us a BS narrative: "3) He was not very political but was moved recently to activism by the genocide in Gaza
Of these, option 3) seems to me the most plausible, though all are certainly possible."
I'm not buying that. At all. Seems to me the best interests of America are served by rounding up and dealing with ALL of the deep state assets in all of their various cubby holes: academia, USAID, military, SES, etc, etc.
If this is a chess move to start the reveal that the UK is NOT our friend, that would not surprise me at all. Just as Zelenskyy going running to his UK puppetmasters when he pisses off President Trump shows that the UK is not our friend. (Not the British people, of course. I'm talking about the people controlling the UK and torturing their own people.)
Okay, is it just me? This article presupposes that UK and the US are allies in what is going on. I think that's the first erroneous assumption, imo. Though I should clarify. The guy worked as a contractor for MI6. Yes, CIA and MI6 are allies. But that does not mean the USA and the UK are allies. These are deep state guys, imo, and the Trump ICE people have honed in on this guy. Of course there's a reason though we don't know what it is. But I think premise two in this guy's article is the most plausible: "2) He was never pro-Palestinian but was infiltrating the protest movement for the British government"
The guys argument that it's #3 seems like straight up trying to sell us a BS narrative: "3) He was not very political but was moved recently to activism by the genocide in Gaza
Of these, option 3) seems to me the most plausible, though all are certainly possible."
I'm not buying that. At all. Seems to me the best interests of America are served by rounding up and dealing with ALL of the deep state assets in all of their various cubby holes: academia, USAID, military, SES, etc, etc.
If this is a chess move to start the reveal that the UK is NOT our friend, that would not surprise me at all. Just as Zelenskyy going running to his UK puppetmasters when he pisses off President Trump shows that the UK is not our friend. (Not the British people, of course. I'm talking about the people controlling the UK and torturing their own people.)