Congress can impeach a judge. Congress can defund the judiciary (except for actual judge’s salaries. But they can defund clerks and others that work for bad judges. They can shut down bad courts, like DC & SDNY.
Impeachment is not the only legitimate and Constitutional method to remove corrupt and/or incompetent judges.
Another remedy people have forgotten is Quo Warranto.
The common law writ of quo warranto has been suppressed at the federal level in the United States, and deprecated at the state level, but remains a right under the Ninth Amendment which was understood and presumed by the Founders, and which affords the only judicial remedy for violations of the Constitution by public officials and agents. A critical key to achieving federal constitutional compliance is to resurrect quo warranto and other common law writs. This involves reasserting and strengthening the original All-Writs Act and repealing or declaring unconstitutional legislation, such as the Anti-Injunction Act, and those Rules of Judicial Procedure, that have restricted the jurisdiction of federal courts to accept petitions for these writs and grant a fair hearing ("oyer") and a decision on the merits ("terminer") on such petitions.
Quo warranto - the legal term for a writ (order) used to challenge another's right to either public or corporate office or challenge the legality of a corporation's charter. When the authority of an offical or corporation to take action is challenged, a quo warranto action may be used to demand that the right upon which they base the action be stated.
Why is this important to you? Because Quo Warranto, like Jury Nullification, is one of the most powerful remedies available to the people against government abuses of power.
There is also:
Writ of Prohibition - "Prohibition is a process by which a superior court prevents an inferior court or tribunal possessing judicial or quasi-judicial powers from exceeding it's jurisdiction in matters over which it has cognizance or usurping matters not within it's jurisdiction to hear or determine. A means of restraint on judicial personnel or bodies to prevent usurpation of judicial power, and it's essential function is to confine inferior courts to their proper jurisdiction and to prevent them from acting without or in excess of their jurisdiction; it is preventive in nature rather than corrective." - Black Law Dictionary Sixth Edition id 842
And, finally, We, the People, have aright to directly remove anyone from office that is in breach of their duty and their oath. The Declaration of Independence clearly states this. Government has no power, except for what we allow it to have. That, unfortunately, is not common knowledge today, as it was in the days of the founders of our Republic. Regardless, it doesn't make it any less true.
These common law actions need to become more common.
Another writ is Writ of Mandamus to mandate that someone do something that is (a) required by law to do, and (b) they are refusing to do (such as turn over documents, for example).
The 9th Amendment is the one they never want to talk about, because it preserved ALL rights that existed at the time of the adoption of the Constitution.
I would love to see any links or sources of info on all of this you might have.
I started off 25 years ago, or so, learning through teamlaw.net. The Admin passed away last year, unfortunately. I also spend a lot of time in law libraries to research things on my own, rather than just accept the answers I found through Teamlaw.net as given.
Michael Badnarik is another person I learned a lot from. He passed away a couple of years ago. His Constitution video series is the best i have ever found to teach it as our founders intended it to be taught.
I have been looking into these things for several years. Tough to sort through fact from possible fact.
I wonder if you have ever heard of (and have any info on) a man named John Nelson.
There was a man named Robert Fox, who passed away a few years ago.
His 12-hour weekend lecture on the law is on video (Bitchute, maybe still on Youtube, even). He had a lot of great info, and I could tell he was the real deal. Too bad his lecture was not nearly complete enough.
He mentioned his friend he worked with a lot, John Nelson. Fox thought Nelson was #1, which says A LOT considering how knowledgeable Fox was.
Fox even won a case that was cited in the annotated statutes, which is extremely rare.
Fox said that when it comes to law, comparing anyone to John Nelson was like comparing a Cessna airplane to the Starship Enterprise.
So, I wonder if you ever came across the name. I haven't found anything.
We need some good classes on these sorts of things if you know of them windsor.
Not 100% sure they’re effective vs commies, but are definitely worth a shot. May work in some places and not in others. Thinking christine_grab tried them in CA to no effect, but there’s also very little power of law there.
Check out both https://teamlaw.net/ and https://badnarik.org/. Both are great places to start with URL's pointing towards other good resources blogs writings, and other things.
See if you have a good law library nearby. They are critical to your research.
Tbh at some point I also have to dig deep on it myself instead of … it’s kindof like casually digging into rocket science. Sure if you’re passionate about just that one thing it’s doable, but with limited deep dig time, need to be specialized for a while with this one.
very well stated my friend. I can't thank you enough for bringing this much intelligence and knowledge to the conversation. You and your information is very much appreciated. Thank you again 427' 🫡🍻
This judge needs to be impeached today. Feckless congress won't do it I'm sure. Maybe the DOJ needs to look into this judge? Trump needs to ignore this shit and let this pedophile looking judge cry in the DOJ and DOJ should refuse to do anything just like dems would do!
It’s an abuse of the law to use the law, and unconstitutional to follow the constitution.
What’s legal and democratic is to have legislation, judge, jury, and executioner all bound up into thousands of unelected, unaccountable, indismissable desk-rulers in a far away land.
Now stop fascistically plotting diligently to leave me alone, bigot. How dare you try and leave people alone, and demand the same? Stop oppressing me by not allowing my oppression!
Now if you’ll excuse me I have a meeting with some Babylonian priests this afternoon, and need to have some beef, wood, and water jugs ready. We are gonna have a barbecue.
ALL of EVERYTHING you said, 🎯 spot fking on and 100% correct. Enough is enough with the same ol same ol bullshit. They, like the judge, need to be made to be too afraid to continuously keep obstructing and breaking the very laws that are put here in place to keep our country safe - not some dumbass hussein appointed judge still doing the devils bidding.
I'm sure there's a room of less than 10 people all just thinking up shit to be thinking up shit...looking at timelines , dragging in this version and that one... perhaps even at this point putting it point blank in their faces "either you go along and get along - or you're out.." as in : out of existence. Either way, I'd say only God knows the answer to that one and man do I wish I knew as well.
The Judge not only blocked POTUS from using the Alien Enemies Act - He ORDERED AN ENTIRE PLANE TO RETURN TO THE US -AFTER- IT WAS ALREADY IN THE AIR.
-thanks to non other than hussein for appointing him. Demon. link here
https://x.com/sandicandie/status/1901102732531941776
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1901103944019120385.html
Hijacking top comment for the non Twitter u rolled link.
Thabks for the post, this was a great find
👍 and thank you very much for the link Honest'. 🍻
Just doing what I can when I can. You are welcome :D
Congress can impeach a judge. Congress can defund the judiciary (except for actual judge’s salaries. But they can defund clerks and others that work for bad judges. They can shut down bad courts, like DC & SDNY.
Impeachment is not the only legitimate and Constitutional method to remove corrupt and/or incompetent judges.
Another remedy people have forgotten is Quo Warranto. The common law writ of quo warranto has been suppressed at the federal level in the United States, and deprecated at the state level, but remains a right under the Ninth Amendment which was understood and presumed by the Founders, and which affords the only judicial remedy for violations of the Constitution by public officials and agents. A critical key to achieving federal constitutional compliance is to resurrect quo warranto and other common law writs. This involves reasserting and strengthening the original All-Writs Act and repealing or declaring unconstitutional legislation, such as the Anti-Injunction Act, and those Rules of Judicial Procedure, that have restricted the jurisdiction of federal courts to accept petitions for these writs and grant a fair hearing ("oyer") and a decision on the merits ("terminer") on such petitions.
Quo warranto - the legal term for a writ (order) used to challenge another's right to either public or corporate office or challenge the legality of a corporation's charter. When the authority of an offical or corporation to take action is challenged, a quo warranto action may be used to demand that the right upon which they base the action be stated.
Why is this important to you? Because Quo Warranto, like Jury Nullification, is one of the most powerful remedies available to the people against government abuses of power.
There is also:
Writ of Prohibition - "Prohibition is a process by which a superior court prevents an inferior court or tribunal possessing judicial or quasi-judicial powers from exceeding it's jurisdiction in matters over which it has cognizance or usurping matters not within it's jurisdiction to hear or determine. A means of restraint on judicial personnel or bodies to prevent usurpation of judicial power, and it's essential function is to confine inferior courts to their proper jurisdiction and to prevent them from acting without or in excess of their jurisdiction; it is preventive in nature rather than corrective." - Black Law Dictionary Sixth Edition id 842
And, finally, We, the People, have aright to directly remove anyone from office that is in breach of their duty and their oath. The Declaration of Independence clearly states this. Government has no power, except for what we allow it to have. That, unfortunately, is not common knowledge today, as it was in the days of the founders of our Republic. Regardless, it doesn't make it any less true.
EXCELLENT COMMENT.
These common law actions need to become more common.
Another writ is Writ of Mandamus to mandate that someone do something that is (a) required by law to do, and (b) they are refusing to do (such as turn over documents, for example).
The 9th Amendment is the one they never want to talk about, because it preserved ALL rights that existed at the time of the adoption of the Constitution.
I would love to see any links or sources of info on all of this you might have.
+1 of course.
At some point I’m going to have to commit to a focused study session as well, but first gotta dig up the materials.
I started off 25 years ago, or so, learning through teamlaw.net. The Admin passed away last year, unfortunately. I also spend a lot of time in law libraries to research things on my own, rather than just accept the answers I found through Teamlaw.net as given.
Michael Badnarik is another person I learned a lot from. He passed away a couple of years ago. His Constitution video series is the best i have ever found to teach it as our founders intended it to be taught.
As for Quo Warranto, here is one good resource citing numerous cases: https://constitution.org/1-Law/uslaw/q-w_cases.htm
Thank you for the resources!
I have been looking into these things for several years. Tough to sort through fact from possible fact.
I wonder if you have ever heard of (and have any info on) a man named John Nelson.
There was a man named Robert Fox, who passed away a few years ago.
His 12-hour weekend lecture on the law is on video (Bitchute, maybe still on Youtube, even). He had a lot of great info, and I could tell he was the real deal. Too bad his lecture was not nearly complete enough.
He mentioned his friend he worked with a lot, John Nelson. Fox thought Nelson was #1, which says A LOT considering how knowledgeable Fox was.
Fox even won a case that was cited in the annotated statutes, which is extremely rare.
Fox said that when it comes to law, comparing anyone to John Nelson was like comparing a Cessna airplane to the Starship Enterprise.
So, I wonder if you ever came across the name. I haven't found anything.
We need some good classes on these sorts of things if you know of them windsor.
Not 100% sure they’re effective vs commies, but are definitely worth a shot. May work in some places and not in others. Thinking christine_grab tried them in CA to no effect, but there’s also very little power of law there.
Check out both https://teamlaw.net/ and https://badnarik.org/. Both are great places to start with URL's pointing towards other good resources blogs writings, and other things.
See if you have a good law library nearby. They are critical to your research.
Ty!
Tbh at some point I also have to dig deep on it myself instead of … it’s kindof like casually digging into rocket science. Sure if you’re passionate about just that one thing it’s doable, but with limited deep dig time, need to be specialized for a while with this one.
very well stated my friend. I can't thank you enough for bringing this much intelligence and knowledge to the conversation. You and your information is very much appreciated. Thank you again 427' 🫡🍻
This judge needs to be impeached today. Feckless congress won't do it I'm sure. Maybe the DOJ needs to look into this judge? Trump needs to ignore this shit and let this pedophile looking judge cry in the DOJ and DOJ should refuse to do anything just like dems would do!
It’s an abuse of the law to use the law, and unconstitutional to follow the constitution.
What’s legal and democratic is to have legislation, judge, jury, and executioner all bound up into thousands of unelected, unaccountable, indismissable desk-rulers in a far away land.
Now stop fascistically plotting diligently to leave me alone, bigot. How dare you try and leave people alone, and demand the same? Stop oppressing me by not allowing my oppression!
Now if you’ll excuse me I have a meeting with some Babylonian priests this afternoon, and need to have some beef, wood, and water jugs ready. We are gonna have a barbecue.
https://files.catbox.moe/aws5tt.jpeg
You said it Bed'.. 100% agreed. 🍻
At what point do the blockades stop? The amount of cleaning up required in 4 years time isn't going to happen if everything is continually blocked.
It is starting to look like half measures. And half of the progress made was lost due to some of these judges.
Need to get past this garbage
ALL of EVERYTHING you said, 🎯 spot fking on and 100% correct. Enough is enough with the same ol same ol bullshit. They, like the judge, need to be made to be too afraid to continuously keep obstructing and breaking the very laws that are put here in place to keep our country safe - not some dumbass hussein appointed judge still doing the devils bidding.
In what Universe will you get enough Senate Demonrats to vote to impeach a lefty judge?
I'm sure there's a room of less than 10 people all just thinking up shit to be thinking up shit...looking at timelines , dragging in this version and that one... perhaps even at this point putting it point blank in their faces "either you go along and get along - or you're out.." as in : out of existence. Either way, I'd say only God knows the answer to that one and man do I wish I knew as well.