A different perspective from a post of a long time lawyer friend, who is very MAGA but disagrees with the admin on this:
"Judge Boasberg, whom I have not met but know by reputation, is not a far-left judge nor one of the crazy lefties. He is a sober judge, well respected and well liked by all who practice before him.
"Judge Boasberg had no choice but to rule as he did given the rules of procedure and existing case law. He issued a TRO to preserve the status quo pending a hearing on the preliminary injunction. That is standard operating procedure in federal courts according to the FRCP. Any judge would have done the same. You hold the status quo until you can study the problem and figure out who is right within 10-15 days. The emergency petition required a snap judgment devoid of any time to study the problem. Judge Boasberg did nothing wrong; what would have been wrong would have been to depart from the law and the FRCP.
"Boasberg merely issued a TRO, good for ten days, until the merits can be reached at a follow up hearing in 10 days. That is SOP for federal courts. I think it likely that the statute does not apply to authorize deportations without hearing, so there may be a problem on the merits.. It's also possible the deportees had due process rights to a hearing before being deported. That, again, is basic law in the U.S. and not something nefarious cooked up by Judge Boasberg. Congress may need to enact clear law authorizing these kinds of deportations."
A different perspective from a post of a long time lawyer friend, who is very MAGA but disagrees with the admin on this:
"Judge Boasberg, whom I have not met but know by reputation, is not a far-left judge nor one of the crazy lefties. He is a sober judge, well respected and well liked by all who practice before him.
"Judge Boasberg had no choice but to rule as he did given the rules of procedure and existing case law. He issued a TRO to preserve the status quo pending a hearing on the preliminary injunction. That is standard operating procedure in federal courts according to the FRCP. Any judge would have done the same. You hold the status quo until you can study the problem and figure out who is right within 10-15 days. The emergency petition required a snap judgment devoid of any time to study the problem. Judge Boasberg did nothing wrong; what would have been wrong would have been to depart from the law and the FRCP.
"Boasberg merely issued a TRO, good for ten days, until the merits can be reached at a follow up hearing in 10 days. That is SOP for federal courts. I think it likely that the statute does not apply to authorize deportations without hearing, so there may be a problem on the merits.. It's also possible the deportees had due process rights to a hearing before being deported. That, again, is basic law in the U.S. and not something nefarious cooked up by Judge Boasberg. Congress may need to enact clear law authorizing these kinds of deportations."
Here is where your diatribe goes off the rails.
These people have no rights they are Illegal Aliens.
They entered the country illegally they have no rights to go in front of anybody before deportation.
Judges do not supersede the President when it comes to immigration.