I suggest that the levels of the relevant branches should be matched. So, the Supreme Court Chief Justice should be required to intervene against a POTUS.
Imagine if things were the other way round and a new FBI recruit could countermand a Supreme Court decision.
It's annoying, yes, but by the same token, if it were a despotic liberal in the White House trampling on rights (e.g., imposing vaccine mandates), wouldn't you want the courts to be able to stop him/her?
You always have to look at things in the light of "if the roles were reversed."
So we don't have a democracy. Duh.
I seem to remember the "Constitutional Republic" thing in first grade.
https://revolver.news/2025/03/the-world-is-noticing-theres-a-legit-coup-underway-in-the-us-led-by-federal-judges/
The Orcs are attacking the castle.
I suggest that the levels of the relevant branches should be matched. So, the Supreme Court Chief Justice should be required to intervene against a POTUS.
Imagine if things were the other way round and a new FBI recruit could countermand a Supreme Court decision.
I knew a couple of districts judges,none of them would dream of doing something like this.
Well, lucky for him, we don't have a democracy, we have a CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC!
Can't have a democracy where you have a republic either can you?
It's annoying, yes, but by the same token, if it were a despotic liberal in the White House trampling on rights (e.g., imposing vaccine mandates), wouldn't you want the courts to be able to stop him/her?
You always have to look at things in the light of "if the roles were reversed."
Not equal. Vaccine mandates aren't in the constitution. Trumps executive powers are as are the judiciaries.