Sounds like sour grapes, pal. You do it. There's a group of hobbyists that analyze unidentified old photos to try and place their location and time. Feel free to take a crack at one or two and show us. I've tried, it's hard even when you're familiar with the area.
Those cuts to him talking fast were the applied logic parts that made the search seem simple. Without the applied logic, the searching would have taken many, many more steps and way longer. Moon into is great for nailing down the direction the image is taken from, and the local time of day. But you're clearly the expert, please explain simply how to do that in fewer steps or without the logic parts.
Take it easy, we're all frogs here. Didn't mean to sound offensive.
I do similar stuff for work, so to me while it may be time consuming, it's not horribly difficult. You could say I was more commenting on the showmanship if you'd prefer (I found it overly wordy, slightly repetitive and wanted him to get to the point).
We teach location searching techniques to our staff, so from my perspective it's not as impressive as it may be to others, but I understand what you are saying. If you aren't practiced in something, it seems difficult or impossible.
For example, to the non-technically minded something as trivial as assembling a computer from parts would be extremely difficult even with all the parts, tools and basic instructions provided.
As impressive as this seems, it really isn't that hard to do with a little practice.
Throw in some moon info and talk a lot about analysis with constant cuts to you talking fast and it sounds really cool. Yeah.
Its as impressive as it seems.
Sounds like sour grapes, pal. You do it. There's a group of hobbyists that analyze unidentified old photos to try and place their location and time. Feel free to take a crack at one or two and show us. I've tried, it's hard even when you're familiar with the area.
Those cuts to him talking fast were the applied logic parts that made the search seem simple. Without the applied logic, the searching would have taken many, many more steps and way longer. Moon into is great for nailing down the direction the image is taken from, and the local time of day. But you're clearly the expert, please explain simply how to do that in fewer steps or without the logic parts.
Take it easy, we're all frogs here. Didn't mean to sound offensive.
I do similar stuff for work, so to me while it may be time consuming, it's not horribly difficult. You could say I was more commenting on the showmanship if you'd prefer (I found it overly wordy, slightly repetitive and wanted him to get to the point).
We teach location searching techniques to our staff, so from my perspective it's not as impressive as it may be to others, but I understand what you are saying. If you aren't practiced in something, it seems difficult or impossible.
For example, to the non-technically minded something as trivial as assembling a computer from parts would be extremely difficult even with all the parts, tools and basic instructions provided.
Matter of perspective.
Concur.