I. Historical Background
The Khazars were a Turkic people whose ruling class converted to Judaism in the 8th–9th century—not out of spiritual conviction, but as a geopolitical maneuver to stay neutral between the Christian and Islamic empires.
After the collapse of their empire, many are believed to have migrated west into Eastern Europe, blending with local Jewish communities, forming a distinct elite with a Jewish identity but secular ambitions.
II. Religion as a Shield, Not a Compass
This group did not descend from the ancient tribes of Israel, nor did they carry the spiritual foundations of Torah-based Judaism.
Jewish identity became a protective cloak:
Used to deflect criticism (e.g., labeling dissent as “antisemitic”).
Used to claim victimhood or moral legitimacy when pursuing political, financial, or global agendas.
True Judaism—based on humility, justice, and covenant—is often in direct opposition to the actions and ethics of these elites.
III. Secular Operation of Power
The Khazarian-descended or ideologically aligned elite operate as a network of secular, globalist actors:
Finance: Central banks, IMF, BIS, major private banks.
Media: Control over mainstream news, entertainment, and publishing.
Politics: Influence over national governments, think tanks, and lobby groups.
NGOs & Foundations: Used to steer public policy and reshape society from the top down.
Their actions are guided by:
Strategic interest, not faith.
Material control, not moral leadership.
Preservation of power, not public good.
IV. Key Characteristics of the Network
Tightly coordinated: Interconnected through bloodlines, intermarriage, foundations, and secret societies.
Global in scope: Not loyal to any one country—loyal to a transnational system of control.
Ideologically deceptive: Presents itself as humanitarian, inclusive, or “chosen,” while acting through manipulation, exploitation, and coercion.
V. Distinction That Matters
This isn’t about “the Jews.” It’s about a secular elite that uses Jewish identity as a tool, and does not represent the values or lineage of spiritual Israel or observant Judaism.
The danger lies in:
Conflating this group with all Jews (which is false and dangerous).
Ignoring their true motives by focusing only on surface identities.
*Without white people there is no Israel. It was white people (British) who paved the way for Israel.
I know 8 and it’s always about how America must fund Israel and defend Israel etc. What do I owe Israel who quite frankly hasn’t done anything for us as an ally?
Wouldn’t be absurd if a bunch of Indonesians for example demanded that we fund and protect Indonesia.
If that were the case everyone would tell them to pound sand and go back to Indonesia. Why should Israel be treated any different.
Without America's military and financial support Israel would not be around today. That was my point, not who paved the way. Your friends are saying that America needs to continue to support Israel because again, it would cease to exist. The walls would close in.
America has funded Israel in total since the 50s, accounting for inflation, LESS than we've funded Ukraine over the last few years. There are many reasons why they are considered a strong ally in a region that is a hotbed for Islamic terrorism. Think of it as a military base that we can launch attacks from if we needed, including by proxy. Even just the threat can be a deterrent.