Yeah, you're arguing. What is it called when you take a position and then propose justifications for that position? At least be honest with yourself. All throughout the Capitol building, there was commotion and no one else was shot. A long time ago, it was ruled that mere trespass did not warrant killing anyone. Shooting is supposed to be a last resort. You are trying to argue that it was the only resort. And "being in a situation" is not a death sentence. I guess the cop was too limp-wristed to punch her in the face, but not so limp-wristed he couldn't shoot a Glock properly. And that would be you?
While individuals have the right to defend themselves and their property, the use of deadly force is only justified in specific circumstances, such as when there is an imminent threat of death or serious bodily harm.
You don’t think the mob and her smashing windows is a threat? Were they smashing those windows for the fun of it?
Smashing windows is not a threat of death or serious bodily harm, particularly if they don't see you. It is vandalism, not assault. You really want to shoot people...
If a mob of people are at my house smashing my windows out and one of them is trying to crawl through that smashed window into my home. You’re damn right I’m going to shoot that person to protect my family. Guess what I wouldn’t be charged for a crime for that!!
I would first tell them to leave or I would use deadly force. I guess that's not in your bag of tricks. The cop was silent and hid himself from view. She never made it through that window, being blown back by the shot. All he needed to do was push her back, not shoot her. And the whole crowd ceased and desisted upon seeing that, indicating that they could be overawed by a show of authority.
Ever taken a class in how to handle a firearm for personal and home defense? You have an itchy trigger finger.
Yeah, you're arguing. What is it called when you take a position and then propose justifications for that position? At least be honest with yourself. All throughout the Capitol building, there was commotion and no one else was shot. A long time ago, it was ruled that mere trespass did not warrant killing anyone. Shooting is supposed to be a last resort. You are trying to argue that it was the only resort. And "being in a situation" is not a death sentence. I guess the cop was too limp-wristed to punch her in the face, but not so limp-wristed he couldn't shoot a Glock properly. And that would be you?
While individuals have the right to defend themselves and their property, the use of deadly force is only justified in specific circumstances, such as when there is an imminent threat of death or serious bodily harm.
You don’t think the mob and her smashing windows is a threat? Were they smashing those windows for the fun of it?
Smashing windows is not a threat of death or serious bodily harm, particularly if they don't see you. It is vandalism, not assault. You really want to shoot people...
If a mob of people are at my house smashing my windows out and one of them is trying to crawl through that smashed window into my home. You’re damn right I’m going to shoot that person to protect my family. Guess what I wouldn’t be charged for a crime for that!!
I would first tell them to leave or I would use deadly force. I guess that's not in your bag of tricks. The cop was silent and hid himself from view. She never made it through that window, being blown back by the shot. All he needed to do was push her back, not shoot her. And the whole crowd ceased and desisted upon seeing that, indicating that they could be overawed by a show of authority.
Ever taken a class in how to handle a firearm for personal and home defense? You have an itchy trigger finger.
https://youtu.be/SjscskqLx0U?si=OWGcCGa5VqZWvhGY
This looks like a threat to me! If she only complied when he had his gun out.
It was evident she didn't even see him. He was hiding himself from view to the side.