me thinks Signal might be compromised to the extent someone back doored and messed with who the message should have been sent to. Waltz already stated that the intended person never received the messages, but instead Goldberg did even though the intended persons name was selected and allegedly Waltz didn't even have contact info for Goldberg.
wouldn't be surprised if Signal is another deep state tool, just like Facebook, google, twitter was, etc, etc
Why would they all use it? Because it is not defective. The way they go about things may be defective. Then the hole is plugged after investigation.
What you are looking at is a "vulnerability" ( note the " " indicating that it may be presented as such, but not necessarily is so) that seems easily evaded.
Do you get invited by just anyone?
Do you have a security pin change regularly?
Do you have a pin to access?
See, the source of this threat is Ukrainian in origin. But, Russia banned Signal because they could not break it. Signal created a proxy system inside the app.
However, if there is one device compromised, does that mean that all devices connected to the user-account on that device, are vulnerable to exploits? Note here that the focus is on phising. What if you could send a pegasus governed link to someone, and that someone uses a setting to preview the contents of the link?
Of course, any app on a mobile device, any laptop, especially in battlefield situations, are vulnerable to investigation by the counter party, and tested for vulnerabilities.
If you read the google threat piece, you'll notice something else: Mitre Corporation.
Given the age of the threat detection, who is to say whether this has also been done by other deep state actors. Or .... actors who wish Signal to go away? Because, if it is thought to be safe to be used by a President, his family, his Cabinet, by CISA, you name it. then who benefits when it is gone? What happens when no one uses Signal? Shall we go back to the typical whatsapp and clones?
You would have to look into that Signal funder, thought to be the Conspirators in Action. No proof of that has ever been given, but they pulled funding at quite a critical juncture, when Signal demonstrated to live up to its claims to protect users privacy.
I think it is important to keep these items in mind when such a ploy is manifested.
He mentions EVERYONE uses it. Meaning all the bad guys may have used it to spill their beans in the past meanwhile their “safe connection” was breached the whole time by white hats who listened and recorded the entire scenario? Trump with the green light = signal tells me this story is about something completely different than what it appears to be.
The man said: it is a witch hunt.
Yeah but why add a comment about Signal being defective? Unless it is?
me thinks Signal might be compromised to the extent someone back doored and messed with who the message should have been sent to. Waltz already stated that the intended person never received the messages, but instead Goldberg did even though the intended persons name was selected and allegedly Waltz didn't even have contact info for Goldberg.
wouldn't be surprised if Signal is another deep state tool, just like Facebook, google, twitter was, etc, etc
Yes Socrates! 🎯
I believe POTUS is introducing the truth about Signal into the narrative...stay tuned more to come
Or not defective .... We all use it.
see: https://greatawakening.win/p/19AwocTbrM/x/c/4eRTKNSDtDt
Why would they all use it? Because it is not defective. The way they go about things may be defective. Then the hole is plugged after investigation.
What you are looking at is a "vulnerability" ( note the " " indicating that it may be presented as such, but not necessarily is so) that seems easily evaded.
See, the source of this threat is Ukrainian in origin. But, Russia banned Signal because they could not break it. Signal created a proxy system inside the app.
However, if there is one device compromised, does that mean that all devices connected to the user-account on that device, are vulnerable to exploits? Note here that the focus is on phising. What if you could send a pegasus governed link to someone, and that someone uses a setting to preview the contents of the link?
Of course, any app on a mobile device, any laptop, especially in battlefield situations, are vulnerable to investigation by the counter party, and tested for vulnerabilities.
Hop-1=> hop-2 => hop-3 => hop-4 => hop-5 => hop-6. 6 degrees of separation!
If you read the google threat piece, you'll notice something else: Mitre Corporation.
Given the age of the threat detection, who is to say whether this has also been done by other deep state actors. Or .... actors who wish Signal to go away? Because, if it is thought to be safe to be used by a President, his family, his Cabinet, by CISA, you name it. then who benefits when it is gone? What happens when no one uses Signal? Shall we go back to the typical whatsapp and clones?
You would have to look into that Signal funder, thought to be the Conspirators in Action. No proof of that has ever been given, but they pulled funding at quite a critical juncture, when Signal demonstrated to live up to its claims to protect users privacy.
I think it is important to keep these items in mind when such a ploy is manifested.
He mentions EVERYONE uses it. Meaning all the bad guys may have used it to spill their beans in the past meanwhile their “safe connection” was breached the whole time by white hats who listened and recorded the entire scenario? Trump with the green light = signal tells me this story is about something completely different than what it appears to be.