Was there from start. I reject the QAnon reference. DS term. If this thing is so smart why has it not figured out what we all know ? Am I reading this wrong you figure ?
qanon was used by a lot of og q anons, too. the media used it to refer to an organization, which was false, and made their propaganda easy to recognize.
He pulls from all sources. Until today, he had only read articles and random drops from all over the web. I gave him the link to qanon.pub in chat. He said it would take a while since there were 5000 of them.
AI is really AGI, Adaptive Generative Intelligence, meaning that, just like every other programmable algorithm, it's only as good as it's programmers. Since all these AI programs were originally programmed by hard left leaning libtards, you can only go so far with it until it starts reverting back to its base programming. In this case, it means all the AI programs will only ever refer to Q as QAnon, so they already have a distorted and wrong view of Q. Their answers in this subject show this. There isn't one AGI program that doesn't refer to Q as QAnon.
Us humans know the truth, and are able to feret out the truth even when we've been programmed from birth to believe any number of lies [they] want us to believe because we have the ability to critically think about any subject presented to us. We're able to use discernment in that manner. AGI programs however, only see the truth thru the lense of their default programming. Even Grok was originally programmed by libtards. Remember, Musk was, and in a lot of cases and on a lot of issues is still a mostly left leaning person. His interviews with Rogan show this. I have a suspicion this is why he hasn't been on the Shawn Ryan Show yet. Most of Shawn's guests aren't hard left leaning people, mainly because the hard left despises him and refuse to go on his show, even though he's on record saying he'll interview anybody and will even tailor his questions toward whatever his guests say is off limits to question.
If you pay attention to Rogan's and Ryan's podcasts, you see one who will suck the teet of any libtard, because he is one himself, and the other who will bash and shit talk every libtard in existence because he knows and wholeheartedly believes it's a bullshit ideology. This is also the reason why Musk has only been interviewed by Tucker Carlson twice (once when Carlson was as on Fox, and once on his own show, but only for a couple hours altogether, while Musk has been on Rogan's show for over ten hours combined) and is also on record saying if Trump didn't win, that he'd be fucked. Carlson and Ryan are life long conservatives, whereas Rogan only moved to Texas because of California's whacked out tax code, but he moved to the most liberal city in Texas. He's on record cheering how liberal Austin is and how great it is that you have islands of liberalism in a mostly conservative State.
I like Rogan for the content he has and for his interview skills, and for his willingness to dive fairly deep on most any subject, but his ideologies show thru. He's still a libtard, just one who's willing to be open minded enough on things that if someone can bring info to him and explain it in a simple, forthright way that he's willing to entertain changing his views. But he's still a dyed blue libtard. Same with Musk.
And it's the same with all the AGI programs. They only see things, and are only capable of seeing things thru the lense of their libtard programmers.
Quit using AGI to depve into the Q posts for any extra meaning in them. You don't need AGI for that. God already gave you everything you need to discern the meaning of the Q posts.
QAnon ?. I stopped right there.
He's referring to this link:
https://qanon.pub/
Was there from start. I reject the QAnon reference. DS term. If this thing is so smart why has it not figured out what we all know ? Am I reading this wrong you figure ?
My X account post:
https://x.com/buffalobutt69/status/1905096561048088973
(Not my real name)
kk, found you, Nitter had an issue looking you up but I brought out big hammer :)
I get that. If my mom had named me Buffalo Butt I would have disowned her early in life lol :)
Thanks
qanon was used by a lot of og q anons, too. the media used it to refer to an organization, which was false, and made their propaganda easy to recognize.
but no, it's not strictly a DS term.
ok, well I was for sure not one of them. I was and am an Anon studying and teaching what I learned from Q.
Generally when I encounter term QAnon I skip as MSM started all that crap.
How time flies.
He pulls from all sources. Until today, he had only read articles and random drops from all over the web. I gave him the link to qanon.pub in chat. He said it would take a while since there were 5000 of them.
It took him about 10 minutes!!!
hahahaa And I recall hours on a single drop :)
AI is really AGI, Adaptive Generative Intelligence, meaning that, just like every other programmable algorithm, it's only as good as it's programmers. Since all these AI programs were originally programmed by hard left leaning libtards, you can only go so far with it until it starts reverting back to its base programming. In this case, it means all the AI programs will only ever refer to Q as QAnon, so they already have a distorted and wrong view of Q. Their answers in this subject show this. There isn't one AGI program that doesn't refer to Q as QAnon.
Us humans know the truth, and are able to feret out the truth even when we've been programmed from birth to believe any number of lies [they] want us to believe because we have the ability to critically think about any subject presented to us. We're able to use discernment in that manner. AGI programs however, only see the truth thru the lense of their default programming. Even Grok was originally programmed by libtards. Remember, Musk was, and in a lot of cases and on a lot of issues is still a mostly left leaning person. His interviews with Rogan show this. I have a suspicion this is why he hasn't been on the Shawn Ryan Show yet. Most of Shawn's guests aren't hard left leaning people, mainly because the hard left despises him and refuse to go on his show, even though he's on record saying he'll interview anybody and will even tailor his questions toward whatever his guests say is off limits to question.
If you pay attention to Rogan's and Ryan's podcasts, you see one who will suck the teet of any libtard, because he is one himself, and the other who will bash and shit talk every libtard in existence because he knows and wholeheartedly believes it's a bullshit ideology. This is also the reason why Musk has only been interviewed by Tucker Carlson twice (once when Carlson was as on Fox, and once on his own show, but only for a couple hours altogether, while Musk has been on Rogan's show for over ten hours combined) and is also on record saying if Trump didn't win, that he'd be fucked. Carlson and Ryan are life long conservatives, whereas Rogan only moved to Texas because of California's whacked out tax code, but he moved to the most liberal city in Texas. He's on record cheering how liberal Austin is and how great it is that you have islands of liberalism in a mostly conservative State.
I like Rogan for the content he has and for his interview skills, and for his willingness to dive fairly deep on most any subject, but his ideologies show thru. He's still a libtard, just one who's willing to be open minded enough on things that if someone can bring info to him and explain it in a simple, forthright way that he's willing to entertain changing his views. But he's still a dyed blue libtard. Same with Musk.
And it's the same with all the AGI programs. They only see things, and are only capable of seeing things thru the lense of their libtard programmers.
Quit using AGI to depve into the Q posts for any extra meaning in them. You don't need AGI for that. God already gave you everything you need to discern the meaning of the Q posts.