Why are American taxpayers subsidizing Tesla? Welfare for the rich. Why? Private emails: GOOG: NK: Tesla. The MEMO is ONLY THE BEGINNING>THE SHOT HEARD AROUND THE WORLD. Q
Next time someone burns a Tesla, remember: We paid for it. If you're displeased with aspects of how Twitter is being run, remember: We paid for it. We own it. We just didn't know it!
https://qalerts.app/?q=%40jack
Same goes for Facebook (LifeLog) and Mark Zuckerberg, Google (GOOG), etc.
- THESE COMPANIES ARE NOT COMPANIES, THEY ARE GOVERNMENT PROGRAMS.
- THEY ARE NOT PRIVATE.
- WE OWN THEM.
- WE DECIDE HOW THEY ARE RUN.
- WE DECIDE WHO RUNS THEM.
- OPEN SOURCE EVERYTHING.
- ALL YOUR ALGOS...
Kash Patel has never been shy about his views on Elon Musk. In a December 2021 interview on Fox News, Patel claimed Musk was the "biggest" contractor for the Department of Defense. "I mean, we’re all paying for it, this is why he’s so rich," he said, referring to Musk’s billion-dollar contracts with the U.S. government.
On his podcast Kash’s Corner, Patel repeatedly attacked Musk’s influence, alleging he had too much control over data and government resources. In 2022, when Musk took over Twitter (now X), Patel said: "He’s already got Tesla, he’s already got the SpaceX program and the government DOD contracts, which I believe to be the largest portion of his income. And now he’ll have Twitter. So what scares me is, you want to talk about a monopoly, he is the ultimate monopoly."
Patel also speculated, without evidence, that Musk could sell data to the Chinese Communist Party. "What do you do with everyone’s personal information? Do you allow the [Chinese Communist Party] to have backdoors like other companies, like TikTok, have done in the past, and sell Americans’ data or provide Americans’ data directly to the CCP for future use against Americans and American interest?" he said.
Musk’s Unexpected Endorsement
Despite this history of criticism, Musk recently threw his weight behind Patel’s nomination to lead the FBI. Sharing a post on X, Musk called for the Senate to confirm him, writing: "Confirm Kash now." The endorsement raised eyebrows, considering their past tensions.
Patel’s Vision for the FBI
Patel is not just another Trump nominee. He has promised a dramatic shake-up within the agency, saying on Steve Bannon’s War Room podcast: "We’re going to come after you, whether it’s criminal or civilly, we’ll figure that out." He has vowed to target members of the media and officials he claims "lied about American citizens" and "helped Joe Biden rig presidential elections."
He has also suggested severely restricting the FBI’s powers, a move that aligns with Republican accusations that the agency has unfairly targeted conservatives under outgoing Director Christopher Wray.
(article continues into Stewpidity)
Google's (and the others, no doubt) true origin: https://qz.com/1145669/googles-true-origin-partly-lies-in-cia-and-nsa-research-grants-for-mass-surveillance
Elon Musk's version of 1A rights on a PUBLIC platform
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1593673339826212864
New Twitter policy is freedom of speech, but not freedom of reach. Negative/hate tweets will be max deboosted & demonetized, so no ads or other revenue to Twitter. You won’t find the tweet unless you specifically seek it out, which is no different from rest of Internet.
That ^ is unconstitutional, sir. That's like sticking a person into a closet in a public building and telling them "you're free to say what you want, but you can't come out of there. If people want to hear what you have to say, they must come find you in this closet."
Politics is not checkers. Kash was right about Elon getting a lot of govt money. Where the argument breaks down is value... Elon provides great value for all the money we send him compared to say Ukraine or USAID. And thank god Elon was in a place financially where he could buy twitter. Maybe Kash dogging Elon was a head-fake.
Fair enough, but not far enough. At some juncture We The People MUST be made fully aware of what Twitter (for one example) actually is and who owns it. We should be the ones deciding who runs it and how it's run, and we should have full transparent access to the algorithms to ensure that there's no funny business going on. Elon won't live forever. Also, there is still shadowbanning and ridiculous hoops to jump through for certain people on there. I still can't get my fucking account back. IP, device-ID and email / phone banned on every level. I'd have to buy a whole new computer or phone to get on there!
Remember this gem? https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1593673339826212864
That ^ is NOT free speech! In fact hold on, I'm putting this into the op it's so retarded.
and whoever downdooted this comment must be retarded as well. What, pray tell, do you disagree with here? I'm genuinely curious
Elon and his cofounders played the democrats well. I don’t begrudge them. The case study of a car company shows just how big the barrier to entry is. The biggest DoD contractor: the DoD is involved in Starlink and Musk has already provided a significant portion of the Golden Dome (IMHO). Space launch is not cheap. But Musk made it cheaper and thus made both of them possible; along with manned missions.
Did Musk make it cheaper or has our own government known how to make it cheaper for decades and is drip-feeding the tech out to us via a proxy (Elon Musk)?
Everything that the government does internally is expensive. So he had a head start. But he also had two big cost savers. The first was having the first stage return to earth and be reusable. The second is the engines. RP-1 (kerosene) and oxygen. Easier to handle the fuel and reuse the engines. He took an existing design and improved dramatically on it.
My friend I am talking at least two decades before that rocket landing. Elon Musk has been a proxy figurehead for black money government projects for his entire adult life. All I'm saying is it's about time We The People learned the truth and got our rightful place in deciding the fates of these taxpayer-funded government projects instead of continuing to be lied to in our faces that "genius Elon Musk created it!" or "Twitter is a private company and Elon bought it!"
The fact that we're still dealing in rockets at all is a slap in the face. The government no doubt has much better tech, paid for by us, yet we're stuck with rockets and HDDs.
Rather valuable person, one that has the means to go rescue astronauts stranded in space. He earns his due.
Will everyone be missing my point today? 😂
I'm not clear on where you get the notion that "we paid for it", "we own it", "we just didn't know it" just because the government has purchased what Elon is selling. I understand that "we" are the government so to speak but who else would we have purchased these things from if not Elon. I'm trying to understand your anger with Elon but I just see him as a businessman doing business kinda like President Trump.
I like Elon and after listening to him speak, I believe that he has the United States best interest at heart and he wants to help us evolve into something better than what we are.
As far as things that Kash has said, I'm not too concerned for one thing because it was so long ago and now that Kash is intimately involved in the running of our country, I wonder if he still feels the same way he once did.
I truly don't understand the hatred for Elon right now when he is doing something that desperately needs done and all some people care about is that he is a billionaire. It reminds me of my liberal niece who thinks that anyone making more money than her is a bad person and should have to give their money to the people who make less than them.
I'm not angry at Elon Musk, I'm trying to wake people up to what Q told us was the case re: Tesla, Twitter, Facebook, Google, Youtube, Instagram, Microsoft, etc. The people who you believe own those companies are not the owners. They did not create them. The government created them (meaning we own them), and put forth their respective CEO's as the figureheads, made up nonsense "rags to riches" stories for them like that movie "The Social Network" to trick us. Do you understand the ramifications of these companies being public utilities instead of private businesses? Not only could they no longer censor us, they could be charged with crimes for attempting to, AMONG other things. And that's where I got the notion
Does anybody on this site even know what's in the Q posts anymore?
Hatred? Kek. How about critical thinking? If I hated Elon Musk I'd choose much stronger language than merely laying out an arguement and encouraging people to think about these things, trust me (;