Fact Sheet: In Shakespeare's time acting was a profession only open to boys and men. Women were acting elsewhere in Europe but they were not allowed to perform in public theatres in England until 1660. They weren't dressed in DRAG. They were men playing women's roles. There is a big difference.
Yeah and to be honest we can all guess with relative certainty that this homosexual gayfer understood exactly what you said already but just needed to cling to some false premise in order to justify her actions.
Did you ever read the book King Rat? One of the characters in the book is a POW who plays the female roles in the plays they put on and he is somewhat of a celebrity in the prison camp. It is one of my favorite books..I've read it at least 3 times.
Nothing stoping them from being as draggy as they want. Trump just rightfully stopped them from spending my tax dollars to fund their desire to "be seen," and fired the dumb bitch who did that with my money!
Smart. I agree with you. We dont have to honor presidents or make an institution out of their combined legacy and it's "meaning" in the "purpose" of our nation. Centered around books? The arts and education? sheeeit. Sounds woke af to me. After they are done, we should fuhgettaboutit.
"A woman shall not wear a man's garment, nor shall a man put on a woman's cloak, for whoever does these things is an abomination to the LORD your God. (Deuteronomy 22:5, ESV)
The Kennedy Center wasn’t too liberal, it was too perverted?
Fact Sheet: In Shakespeare's time acting was a profession only open to boys and men. Women were acting elsewhere in Europe but they were not allowed to perform in public theatres in England until 1660. They weren't dressed in DRAG. They were men playing women's roles. There is a big difference.
Well, as far as I know, Shakespeare Never Performed in his own Shows....
She should know that he directed, sure, but was not a Performer....
Yeah and to be honest we can all guess with relative certainty that this homosexual gayfer understood exactly what you said already but just needed to cling to some false premise in order to justify her actions.
Just like POWs during the war. Keep moral up with skits. Someone had to stuff their shirt😂
Did you ever read the book King Rat? One of the characters in the book is a POW who plays the female roles in the plays they put on and he is somewhat of a celebrity in the prison camp. It is one of my favorite books..I've read it at least 3 times.
No, putting it on my TO READ list. Thanks fren
It was a defining book in my later youth. Everyone hated him but every sick man got two eggs daily.
got it from my public school library
Yes, it was too perverted. Yes, she should have been fired, she doesn't have the morals required to fill this position.
Potato potahto...
Their idea of "being seen" isn't compatible with that of most God-fearing Americans.
Nothing stoping them from being as draggy as they want. Trump just rightfully stopped them from spending my tax dollars to fund their desire to "be seen," and fired the dumb bitch who did that with my money!
Why is any of our money used for this BS , if X presidents want centers and library’s and anything else named after them let them pay for it .
Smart. I agree with you. We dont have to honor presidents or make an institution out of their combined legacy and it's "meaning" in the "purpose" of our nation. Centered around books? The arts and education? sheeeit. Sounds woke af to me. After they are done, we should fuhgettaboutit.
Just more way to launder money , I’m so sick of it ,, how about the Smithsonian omg what a demonic place that is to rob us from history !
I loved going to the Smithsonians in D.C. when I was a kid. Stoked to take mine there.
Look into the Getty, it's just a massive Mess....
I’m out here I know about th children anc tunnels etc .
Perfectly said. Thank you.
"A woman shall not wear a man's garment, nor shall a man put on a woman's cloak, for whoever does these things is an abomination to the LORD your God. (Deuteronomy 22:5, ESV)
Congress has ONE constitutional power to promote the arts and sciences.....patents. That's it.
The federal government should not fund the arts with our tax money.
Patents for technology (not science) and copyrights for the arts and letters.