I wasn't told to think anything, and Hitler wanted "what was best for Germany" at the price of conquest, war, destruction, and genocide. That's not "nationalism," that's wrath and intolerance. Boy, a Hitler lover. I never thought I would meet one. You were certainly told to think something and it was poison.
No brainwashing. Just a lot of reading of multiple sources. See, here's the problem: If you don't like a point of view, or can't answer it, you claim "you're brainwashed!," as though that says anything. Actually, since you don't have any testimony or evidence, you are the one who is brainwashed. And willingly so. He was in charge up to 29 April 1945. Just ask Karl Doenitz, who had to sign the surrender document.
CNN, MSNBC, Wikipedia, school textbooks written by the (tribe)?
Observe his actions, listen to his words, and see what he did. Weimar Germany was drowning in debt, inflation, and faggotry. NSDAP Germany had a booming economy that wasn't done by a war.
Oh, great. He had to dispossess, dehumanize, deport, and murder the Jews, as well as conquer neighboring nations in order to complete the program. So, you are arguing that elimination of human rights and democratic government is the correct price for a booming economy? Yep, I guess so. You are good with it.
There are primary works of history and documentation that have nothing to do with CNN, MSNBC, Wikipedia, or school textbooks. I have never watched CNN or MSNBC, or use them for historical reference As far as Wikipedia is concerned, you go ahead and prove all the cited sources are false. I really don't recall anything about the Third Reich from my "school textbooks." I have shelves of historical sources that I have read, from witnesses and key actors. I have read both of Hitler's books, but I doubt that you have.
I wasn't told to think anything, and Hitler wanted "what was best for Germany" at the price of conquest, war, destruction, and genocide. That's not "nationalism," that's wrath and intolerance. Boy, a Hitler lover. I never thought I would meet one. You were certainly told to think something and it was poison.
You still believe what was brainwashed in to you.
No brainwashing. Just a lot of reading of multiple sources. See, here's the problem: If you don't like a point of view, or can't answer it, you claim "you're brainwashed!," as though that says anything. Actually, since you don't have any testimony or evidence, you are the one who is brainwashed. And willingly so. He was in charge up to 29 April 1945. Just ask Karl Doenitz, who had to sign the surrender document.
CNN, MSNBC, Wikipedia, school textbooks written by the (tribe)?
Observe his actions, listen to his words, and see what he did. Weimar Germany was drowning in debt, inflation, and faggotry. NSDAP Germany had a booming economy that wasn't done by a war.
Oh, great. He had to dispossess, dehumanize, deport, and murder the Jews, as well as conquer neighboring nations in order to complete the program. So, you are arguing that elimination of human rights and democratic government is the correct price for a booming economy? Yep, I guess so. You are good with it.
There are primary works of history and documentation that have nothing to do with CNN, MSNBC, Wikipedia, or school textbooks. I have never watched CNN or MSNBC, or use them for historical reference As far as Wikipedia is concerned, you go ahead and prove all the cited sources are false. I really don't recall anything about the Third Reich from my "school textbooks." I have shelves of historical sources that I have read, from witnesses and key actors. I have read both of Hitler's books, but I doubt that you have.