Look, you are imputing things to people out of pique, not out of honesty. The value of the science at the center of things is not nullified by the fact that we still have questions. If there were no questions, there would have been no science. And without science, there would have been no technology. And technology helps us identify where the science is inadequate, thus continuing the cycle of discovery and insight.
Cellphones are phenomenal inventions. The miniaturization alone is superb. The computing power is hard to appreciate. We take them for granted. Yet you want to reduce them to the importance of crayons. That says more about you than about cellphones.
You ask questions that I don't think you even understand. We observe gravity because we see its effects. In that respect, it is no different than electromagnetism, yet you don't carp about its mysteries. The theories only break down in environments where other factors and forces come into play, such as quantum-mechanical effects and nuclear forces. But we don't get into those environments without the technologies and science that got us to them. And the theories must become different to deal with newly-observed phenomena. I guess you are not in the spirit of scientific research. How do we progress, except by steps?
The big monuments are big monuments. We have tried to understand, but still have questions. What do you want? Endless bashing of our foreheads against a wall? The archaeologists are busy. Some things may be lost...forever. They did build graves for their kings. The structures say so. Mummies and deceased remains have been found there. The pyramids offend you if that is what they were? Too bad. The past was never made for your approval.
It is interesting that you think I am talking down to you. If you were at the same level, you wouldn't feel that at all. I've been doing advanced technology for 40-50 years, so I have knowledge and perspective. The "fake science" has done everything for us, and you disparage it. More sadly, you don't know how to accept an "explanation." We are not in a "matrix." This is a real world. With real technology. Derived from real science. You are only complaining that we are not omniscient, like gods. That's an old complaint. And no one who has a life to live bothers to listen to it.
Look, you are imputing things to people out of pique, not out of honesty. The value of the science at the center of things is not nullified by the fact that we still have questions. If there were no questions, there would have been no science. And without science, there would have been no technology. And technology helps us identify where the science is inadequate, thus continuing the cycle of discovery and insight.
Cellphones are phenomenal inventions. The miniaturization alone is superb. The computing power is hard to appreciate. We take them for granted. Yet you want to reduce them to the importance of crayons. That says more about you than about cellphones.
You ask questions that I don't think you even understand. We observe gravity because we see its effects. In that respect, it is no different than electromagnetism, yet you don't carp about its mysteries. The theories only break down in environments where other factors and forces come into play, such as quantum-mechanical effects and nuclear forces. But we don't get into those environments without the technologies and science that got us to them. And the theories must become different to deal with newly-observed phenomena. I guess you are not in the spirit of scientific research. How do we progress, except by steps?
The big monuments are big monuments. We have tried to understand, but still have questions. What do you want? Endless bashing of our foreheads against a wall? The archaeologists are busy. Some things may be lost...forever. They did build graves for their kings. The structures say so. Mummies and deceased remains have been found there. The pyramids offend you if that is what they were? Too bad. The past was never made for your approval.
It is interesting that you think I am talking down to you. If you were at the same level, you wouldn't feel that at all. I've been doing advanced technology for 40-50 years, so I have knowledge and perspective. The "fake science" has done everything for us, and you disparage it. More sadly, you don't know how to accept an "explanation." We are not in a "matrix." This is a real world. With real technology. Derived from real science. You are only complaining that we are not omniscient, like gods. That's an old complaint. And no one who has a life to live bothers to listen to it.