You heard more than what she said. She said that according to the rule, the bond is precedent to the injunction, meaning that if they obeyed the rule they would determine the bond before ruling on the injunction. It is just another rule they are flaunting.
(Could be worse; they could've subverted the rule by determining it only needed a $10 bond and then going ahead.)
You heard more than what she said. She said that according to the rule, the bond is precedent to the injunction, meaning that if they obeyed the rule they would determine the bond before ruling on the injunction. It is just another rule they are flaunting.
(Could be worse; they could've subverted the rule by determining it only needed a $10 bond and then going ahead.)