Where is this alleged follow-up post by Virginia?? IG anons plz help.
This article is 90% fluff, 10% unsourced claims, which is a red flag to me. Why embed the details of such a bombshell retraction (or whatever 'this' is) inside a mountain of rehashed or tertiary information, giant page-long images and ads? It feels like they're trying to bypass your mind and get you to hook on the claim. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14559989/Virginia-Giuffre-says-mistakenly-posted-claim-four-days-left-live-Instagram.html
Anyways, here are the only pertinent parts:
'Concerning her Instagram post, Virginia thought that she had posted on her private Facebook page. [...] police in Australia appeared to confirm that Ms Giuffre had only been involved in what they described as a 'minor' crash with a school bus with no initial reports of anyone being injured. A Western Australia Police Force spokesperson at the time said they were aware of a 'minor crash' between a bus and a car in Neergabby, north of Perth, on March 24. The collision was reported by the bus driver the following day. The car sustained about $2,000 (£1,547) worth of damage but there were no injuries reported, the spokesperson said.
I don't find any sources in the article, unless I'm missing them due to the massive pile of irrelivent dogshit...can anyone find them?
Also of note, that vile bitch who said Virginia was receiving "karma" gave DailyMail an exclusive for this article:
Lady Victoria, 48, was dubbed 'nasty' and 'vile' by many social media users since she posted Ms Giuffre's selfie in a hospital bed with the word 'Karma' added to it. But the aristocrat who briefly dated Prince Andrew in 1999 refused to back down from her brutal Instagram post today. Speaking exclusively to MailOnline, she said she was continuing to doubt Ms Giuffre's claims that she had been seriously hurt in the crash and had only days to live due to her injuries including kidney failure. She said: 'Virginia Guiffre is a fantasist. It's been a long drawn out process these last few years, but it's unravelling. Her lies are being exposed. Let's see in three days, but I bet she will still be alive'
One last thing, I love how they hyperlinked certain words such as 'Facebook' or 'Virginia Giuffre' to make you think "oh look there's a source" yet when you click them, it takes you to their own website's homepage. Kek. "These stupid people won't actually click on those links!"
More Details here
https://www.news.com.au/entertainment/celebrity-life/royals/new-details-emerge-as-prince-andrew-accuser-virginia-roberts-giuffre-has-days-to-live/news-story/d5624e9824072b58f1aa458c6323eb24
https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/us-news/prince-andrew-sex-accuser-virginia-34973967
Tyvm. Again in both articles there is no sauce for the retraction... makes me wonder is this an op?
Seems she put out a press release.
An old school statement. To the news media
Might be her family that put it out
Even if you mistakenly posted it to public, you still posted you are gonna die in 4 days because of an accident. Two things come to mind now. This was all fake to keep us from looking at them. Or, she caught wind of a sudden death to herself and she prevented it.
You make good points fren
Told ya this was all bullshit.
Notable: Further down in the article, there is this:
AND
AND
etc
So, tying DJT in to the Epstein situation again could be a priority objective, driving an impetus to highlight Epstein stuff in that context.
But the likelihood is:
https://www.google.com/search?q=robert+jobson
The headline here is:
"Giuffre is a liar, and her claims about Prince Andrew are probably lies, too!!!!"
related article, date April 3 (otday)
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14563827/Bus-driver-crash-Virginia-Giuffre-four-days-live-story.html
A bunch of reported data (aka the narrative) here are noteworthy
giuffre appears to be 'estranged' from her 3 children, and now separated from husband
apparent conflict between wife and husband, and children
violations of restraining order by Giuffre
Giuffre's posts describe severe illness and possibility of death
claims contradicted by bus driver
how much the narrative is true, we cannot know, but the narrative appears to suggest (to me) that Giuffre used the incident as an opportunity to try emotional blackmail on her husband and/or children. She may have been quite honest when she said "it was posted on Instagram by mistake" and she had intended to post it in private facebook feed, for the above said purpose.
Seems possible, but the Daily Mail etc or certain editors would be motivated to use ANYTHING to cast doubt on the veracity of Giuffre's claims re: Andrew and Epstein, etc.
Seems to me that this is the core motivation for reporting and detailing this narrative.
Your vision is 20/20. Dang. I didn't see hardly any of that beyond "this article is sauceless and suspicious, and why are they spending so much of it rehashing the story we already know"
A: because they are reframing the entire thing!