The Constitution was written with variations of Christianity in mind. The framers didn't take into account that one day we might be mass-importing people from a religion that taught, "Kill or subjugate all unbelievers unless they submit." If that had occurred to them, the Constitution's framers might have added a clause that excluded protection for the practice of murderous cults that called themselves a religion.
You can go by what they wrote, or by what you think they meant. Others may read minds differently though. And the framers cant be asked what they really meant when they wrote something that seems misleading, or like misinformation.
I doubt they supported "Kill or subjugate all who don't revere a mass-murdering pedophile and rapist, worship his god, follow his barbaric rules that say adherents must kill and fight until all are made to submit." But yes, you're right - they didn't spell that out. That's what Constitutional amendments are for.
what i meant was that from the perspective of someone that wants a homogenous ethnographic OR religious group, the constitution is a roadblock. They say the constitution is the soul of America.
constitutional rights get in the way. freedom of speech, freedom to practice religion, etc.. Was the constitution all a mistake? I dont think so
The Constitution was written with variations of Christianity in mind. The framers didn't take into account that one day we might be mass-importing people from a religion that taught, "Kill or subjugate all unbelievers unless they submit." If that had occurred to them, the Constitution's framers might have added a clause that excluded protection for the practice of murderous cults that called themselves a religion.
Two "religions" teach (more like demand) that, whether we're called infidel or goyim.
You can go by what they wrote, or by what you think they meant. Others may read minds differently though. And the framers cant be asked what they really meant when they wrote something that seems misleading, or like misinformation.
I doubt they supported "Kill or subjugate all who don't revere a mass-murdering pedophile and rapist, worship his god, follow his barbaric rules that say adherents must kill and fight until all are made to submit." But yes, you're right - they didn't spell that out. That's what Constitutional amendments are for.
I woulda set it up different, but there it is.
Also what the USS Constitution was for.
Can you elaborate on your comment?
what i meant was that from the perspective of someone that wants a homogenous ethnographic OR religious group, the constitution is a roadblock. They say the constitution is the soul of America.
You are right, and wrong. Scratching the surface. There are still limitations to these freedoms.
Read more into "freedom to practice religion" in the constitution, then understand Sharia Law. There is a major conflict here.
i.e. - freedom of speech - you can't say bomb on an airplane without repercussions now can you?