I certainly didn't read it that way. Why don't these reporters write in understandable English? If that is what they are saying, fine-but, like I said, I didn't read it at all like that. My thoughts on Roberts:

He is a terrible judge and shouldn't be anywhere near decisions involving the constitution-my simple opinion. As far as him fighting for cases involving Trump, I wish he would stay away. His decisions are not good for conservatives, usually. I can't change his mind, but he doesn't seem to be like the person who was at the hearing for his appointment to the Supreme Court. He had a great memory and didn't need many, if any, notes. Like I said his decision on the Affordable Care Act should have been sent back to congress to pass it as a tax, but he just changed the way it was written-Congress did not pass that tax. And I, personally, don't believe he should have done that. Justice Roberts can not pass a tax on Americans, but Congress can and didn't-they passed it as a penalty, then the Obama administration's lawyers (I think) went to the court and argued it as a penalty and as a tax. As you can see this one decision weighs heavily on my mind. But I do understand your point..