Most of us know most of this information already, but it is a great refresher, and I found info in there that was new to me. I know I have recently had several normies come to me with questions, and this is a great article to answer those questions since it does such a beautiful job of connecting the dots. The article is long. I have copied and pasted the opening summary. The rest of the article is a deep-dive into each of the 12-points listed. When normies ask me questions, rather than overwhelm them with too much info, I copy paste the deep dives that they ask about. Then, when they ask follow up questions, I copy and paste the next relevant section. In my opinion, spoon feeding is the secret.
Murder by Injection: The Story of the Medical Conspiracy Against America (1988) By Eustace Mullins – 50 Q&As – Unbekoming Book Summary
https://unbekoming.substack.com/p/murder-by-injection-the-story-of
12-point summary
Control Through Education: The Rockefeller and Carnegie foundations transformed medical education through the Flexner Report, reducing medical schools from 650 to 50 and establishing a drug-based curriculum while eliminating natural healing approaches.
Financial Control Network: A sophisticated network of banks, foundations, and corporations maintained monopoly control through interlocking directorates, with the Rockefeller and Rothschild interests at the center, operating through institutions like Chase Manhattan Bank and various European financial houses.
Drug Trust Development: The pharmaceutical cartel emerged from patent medicine makers who transitioned to "ethical" drug companies, creating a closed system of drug development, testing, and distribution that eliminated competition while ensuring high profits.
Cancer Industry Creation: The American Cancer Society and Memorial Sloan Kettering became central forces in controlling cancer treatment, promoting only surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy while systematically suppressing alternative treatments and information about prevention.
Government Agency Capture: Key agencies like the FDA and NIH became enforcement arms of the Medical Monopoly through a revolving door system where officials moved between government and industry positions, ensuring regulatory decisions favored monopoly interests.
Research Manipulation: Control of research funding through foundations, government grants, and corporate money ensured that medical research focused on profitable pharmaceutical approaches while suppressing investigation of nutritional, preventive, and alternative treatments.
Chemical Agriculture Impact: The introduction of chemical fertilizers, pesticides, and food additives created a cycle of declining food quality and increasing health problems, generating more demand for pharmaceutical treatments.
International Cartel Operations: Companies like I.G. Farben demonstrated how the drug cartel operated internationally, maintaining profit-sharing arrangements even during World War II and reorganizing afterward to maintain monopoly control.
Prison Testing Programs: Pharmaceutical companies used prisoners for dangerous drug testing, paying minimal amounts for experiments that often resulted in severe injuries or death, while gathering data to help avoid future lawsuits.
Water Treatment Programs: Fluoridation and chlorination programs created profitable markets for industrial waste products while establishing mechanisms for population-wide chemical exposure, despite evidence of harmful effects.
Alternative Medicine Suppression: Systematic campaigns eliminated competing medical approaches through legal persecution, loss of licensing, media attacks, and economic pressure, regardless of their effectiveness.
Public Health Decline: Despite enormous healthcare spending, American health statistics have steadily declined relative to other developed nations, demonstrating the Medical Monopoly's success at generating profits while failing to improve public health.
At this point, the hard core normies are so deep into the sauce that actual proof means nothing to them. I've tried and the response I get is "this is nothing but right wing propaganda!" No, seriously, that's what I get. They're so damaged. What's left of the normies is the percentage that will never recover.
My favorite is "Those are talking points."
Excuse me for actually making a point while talking
That is exactly why I like this article. Normies have been brainwashed to self-filter out certain phrases. This utilizes different language that the normies have not been taught to self-filter, so they may actually hear these words. The secret, though, it to only give small bits of info upon their request. If they don't ask for the info, the soil isn't fertile. If you give too much info, they shut off.
Here is a specific example in a conversation. At a party, someone had said to me "Those Q conspiracy people think there is a global pedophile network!"
And I replied "Ghislaine Maxwell is in jail right now for running that network."
And then I shut up. And I could see him connecting the dots in his head. He then changed the topic and I happily let him talk about things he was more comfortable with while processing that Maxwell concept in the back of his head.
I haven't seen him again to know if the seed germinated or not, but I was careful to not throw too much at him so he could get his mind around that concept.
My favorite when speaking to a female leftist was "You're using debate tactics on me!" when I was just being logically consistent. It wasn't "debate tactics" she felt, but rather her own brain going "Oh, right, that makes sense."
You planted a seed! That is all you can do. Then you step back and let it germinate. If the soil isn't fertile it won't germinate. If it is moderately fertile, it may take a very long time to germinate.
The only step further you could have taken that conversation was to ask "what do you mean by that?" Asking her explain to you what she was thinking may have helped her clarify her own thoughts. That may have helped speed up the seed germination process.
But whether you took it that step further or not, her answer indicated that was the stopping point. Any more info would be overwhelming and she would have shut off.
Well put.
At this point, I'm done with the "normies". Fuck'em! We knew there was going to be a % that would never recover, and we're there. Leave'm in a ditch and keep moving forward.
I disagree. I do not say a word unless they ask because if they don't ask, it is not fertile soil. I spoon feed small bits of info and stop. I wait until they ask again. It's seed planting. If you plant too many seeds, they can't grow. You have to plant one seed at a time, and once it germinates, you can plant the next seed. They'll tell you when it germinated.
My favorite normie experience was when I went into FBI data, made a report and drew my own conclusions, presented them and my source and methods, and because my conclusions were counter to the narrative, they hand-wave dismissed everything I said with “that’s just made-up nonsense.”
This was in the middle of Obumba, but just absolutely blew my mind. They very literally won’t accept anything that isn’t fed to them by their selected (or assigned) narrative authority.
They have been taught to self-filter information counter to the narrative.
One of the most important secrets is small bits of information at a time. Too much info and they shut down and filter all of it out. I guarantee that you presented too much info.
Another secret is language choice -- not using phrases that have already been flagged to self-filter. Such words may have been in there, which (in their minds) justified why they needed to discredit everything you said.
The last secret is to not offer if they don't ask. If they don't ask, the soil isn't fertile and you are wasting your time.
Even today I probably don’t have that issue fixed. At the time it was definitely part of the problem.
:: innocent whistling ::
I’m normally a very patient sort of person, but that stuff just pisses me off. Literal pavlovian reactions like they’re mindless trained animals.
These are among the reasons that I stopped engaging with normies and limit myself to here where people know how to think, so my issues in those areas are (probably) less of a problem.
Very accurate diagnosis.
:)
It has been this way for a long time. Nothing realltly changes. People always yean for a "truth", something to believe in. If you don't believe in something higher, you imprint on people and their institutions. You then have faith in a person (usually a charismatic leader or celebrity) and act as a literal cult.
This is an excellent point. In my own experience, I think that non-believers have a hard time taking off the blinders because this is a spiritual war. If they are going to take off the blinders, it means also accepting that good/evil are actual spiritual forces and not merely abstract concepts. Its a major shattering of world-views for them and they would rather self-filter than experience such inner turmoil or reshaping their world view.
I just read all of your comments. What a great exchange. I too have been frustrated but have realized something new about my normie friends and family. They are much angrier. My thoughts are that they are angry because deep down they know they have been lied to and fooled for a long time.
Lately when I am either asked or engaged in a conversation, I just tell them the truth. If they are either confused or angry I say "you can look it up if you want"
Then I walk away or change the subject.
Excellent strategy! If the seed germinates, they will look up more info when they are ready.
I agree with your opinions that the normies are angry because they know deep down they have been lied to. I think most of us experienced similar anger when we chose to take the blinders off, too. The anger passes when we come to terms with reality -- but as long as they choose to keep those blinders on, they will stay angry.
u/#updoot