And here is a general disregard for a ruling from the Supreme Court.
The ruling that the President is within his article powers, and the challenge to deportation should be a habeus claim in the closest court to the prison (i.e. not a federal court), is like a reprimand from within the judiciary hierarchy itself: reprimanding the feral judges who are attempting to interfere with executive actions. This current emerging issue is not even about the judiciary interacting with the executive branch (and the powers are meant to be kept separated, etc.).
Do the SC have a mechanism to disbar or impeach judges, for going against their ruling? (mind you, it was 5-4, so ther is some disagreement).
Anyway, what's the feral judge's excuse this time?
That venue question turns on whether these transfer claims belong in habeas corpus proceedings or instead may be brought under the Administrative Procedure Act. I agree with the Court’s analysis that the claims must be brought in habeas,” Justice Kavanaugh
Instead, Boasberg desperately clings to the APA route, which has already failed, BTW. Chances are, it will fail again, on the taxpayers dime, no less.
Judge Boasberg has left the federal court and entered the court of public opinion.
He is betting on the crazed pink-haired antifas having his back, and he seems to have already forgotten the vast majority of our nation voted against his style of bullshlit.
This sure is setting up for a Constitutional Crisis.
Who is in charge of the Executive Branch? Who is the Commander-in-Chief?
Does the US Constitution say the President is in charge of both, or does it say the Legislative Branch is actually in charge of everything?
I think we all know the answers.
And here is a general disregard for a ruling from the Supreme Court.
The ruling that the President is within his article powers, and the challenge to deportation should be a habeus claim in the closest court to the prison (i.e. not a federal court), is like a reprimand from within the judiciary hierarchy itself: reprimanding the feral judges who are attempting to interfere with executive actions. This current emerging issue is not even about the judiciary interacting with the executive branch (and the powers are meant to be kept separated, etc.).
Do the SC have a mechanism to disbar or impeach judges, for going against their ruling? (mind you, it was 5-4, so ther is some disagreement).
Anyway, what's the feral judge's excuse this time?
Instead, Boasberg desperately clings to the APA route, which has already failed, BTW. Chances are, it will fail again, on the taxpayers dime, no less.
Judge Boasberg has left the federal court and entered the court of public opinion.
He is betting on the crazed pink-haired antifas having his back, and he seems to have already forgotten the vast majority of our nation voted against his style of bullshlit.
indeed, I see what you did there. His fate is sealed as THE judge the most crooked will forum-shop for. Sort of like hanging a plaque on the door.