That's why they gave up on Communism ages ago, even though the party kept the name. You can't install communism without a fascist totalitarian regime (people have to be forced not to engage in trade for a profit), but you can be a fascist totalitarian regime and not practice Communism.
China used to be the former, now they're the latter. You can be industrious and earn a personal profit in China now. That's literally NOT Communism. It's still a fascist totalitarian regime that runs their country like a prison, but Communism is an economic model (one that naturally self-destructs) and they don't practice that in China anymore.
A communist person would be someone who believes Communism can work and thus, wants Communism. A communist government would be a fascist government that implements communism (I assume they're fascist/totalitarion/dictatorial because you can't implement communism without forcing people to go along with it--which is fascism).
China already knows from experience that communism doesn't work, that's why they scrapped it. You're basically using communist/communism as a loose pejorative that encompasses any person or regime who believes in total government control.
There are actual communists in our country--people who actually believe that Capitalism is evil and Communism is the solution. They're mostly C- college students who smoke pot all day, but yeah, they qualify. But that's just not China anymore.
Fascist dictatorship? Yes. Communist? Not anymore. Their government is fascist/authoritarian/dictatorial, but no, they don't practice, or believe in communism anymore (if they did believe in it they'd still practice it, they're a dictatorship after all).
Simple example: all cats are animals but not all animals are cats.
All communist governments are fascist, but not all fascist governments are communist. They're all on the left though.
Not every person in china wants communism.
the younger Chinese people are rising against it all the time
some, and they should be supported by Americans and the west
That's why they gave up on Communism ages ago, even though the party kept the name. You can't install communism without a fascist totalitarian regime (people have to be forced not to engage in trade for a profit), but you can be a fascist totalitarian regime and not practice Communism.
China used to be the former, now they're the latter. You can be industrious and earn a personal profit in China now. That's literally NOT Communism. It's still a fascist totalitarian regime that runs their country like a prison, but Communism is an economic model (one that naturally self-destructs) and they don't practice that in China anymore.
so only communist if implementing a certain economic model. shit theres pribably no communists in the us after all! you solved it!
A communist person would be someone who believes Communism can work and thus, wants Communism. A communist government would be a fascist government that implements communism (I assume they're fascist/totalitarion/dictatorial because you can't implement communism without forcing people to go along with it--which is fascism).
China already knows from experience that communism doesn't work, that's why they scrapped it. You're basically using communist/communism as a loose pejorative that encompasses any person or regime who believes in total government control.
There are actual communists in our country--people who actually believe that Capitalism is evil and Communism is the solution. They're mostly C- college students who smoke pot all day, but yeah, they qualify. But that's just not China anymore.
Fascist dictatorship? Yes. Communist? Not anymore. Their government is fascist/authoritarian/dictatorial, but no, they don't practice, or believe in communism anymore (if they did believe in it they'd still practice it, they're a dictatorship after all).
Simple example: all cats are animals but not all animals are cats.
All communist governments are fascist, but not all fascist governments are communist. They're all on the left though.
Thank you. Sounds like you agree with me on those points. I wasnt confused about them.
agree