I always thought this was more of a NWO brainchild top down control scheme. Why is Trump resurrecting it?
A National Real ID, as envisioned under the REAL ID Act, raises concerns about privacy, bureaucratic burdens, and potential for misuse. While proponents argue it enhances security, critics point to the risk of creating a centralized database accessible to various entities, increasing the likelihood of data breaches and identity theft. Additionally, the Act's implementation could lead to higher costs and administrative hassles for both states and individuals.
Here's a more detailed look at the potential implications: Privacy Concerns: Data Consolidation: REAL ID would create a national database of personal information, potentially making it easier for both government and private entities to track and access individuals' data. "Machine-Readable Zone": The act mandates unencrypted "machine-readable zones" on ID cards, allowing anyone with a barcode reader to skim personal information. Expanded Use Beyond Security: The Act's proponents claim it's for security, but there are concerns that REAL ID cards could be used for various purposes, potentially expanding government surveillance. Administrative and Economic Burdens: State Implementation Costs: States would face significant costs to redesign driver's licenses, update databases, and train personnel, with little federal funding support. Higher Fees and Hassles: Individuals could face higher fees and longer wait times at DMVs, as well as bureaucratic difficulties related to obtaining and using REAL ID cards. Increased Identity Theft Risk: The creation of a large, centralized database could make it an attractive target for identity thieves. Potential for Misuse: Surveillance Society: REAL ID could contribute to a surveillance society by facilitating routine tracking and monitoring of individuals. Private Sector Data Collection: Businesses could collect and sell data from REAL ID cards, potentially creating for-profit databases without the same privacy protections as government data. Weakened Security: While proponents claim improved security, critics argue that REAL ID could create vulnerabilities in the identification system and may not effectively deter criminals or terrorists. Other Considerations: Constitutional Concerns: Some argue that REAL ID infringes on states' rights and the principle of federalism. Lack of Benefit: Critics question whether REAL ID will actually enhance security or create unnecessary costs and burdens without a significant benefit. In conclusion, while proponents tout the potential for improved security, critics raise serious concerns about privacy, administrative burdens, and potential for misuse of the REAL ID system. The Act's implementation could have far-reaching consequences for individuals and state governments alike.
The anarchists and libertarian retards roll around thinking that if only the government would just go and never look at anybody that everything would be peachy keen and great. Wrong. You put real ID power in the hands of the deep state, next you know we're all living in a police state. You put real ID power in the hands of the white hats? The next thing you know you have legitimate, defensible election results. Choose wisely.
I can't tell where you stand on it, but I'm wondering how we EVER can verify citizenship for voting without providing a birth certificate as proof? And why is it a big deal to have to provide one proof of address (your electric bill doesn't mean they suddenly can tap into your bank account)? Social security number needs to be provided in MANY scenarios, also when applying for public benefits, etc. so they have all that info on a LOT of people already. Maybe I'm missing something? To get a passport, you need to give the govt everything but your firstborn child. What is the difference?